Teams

Suntree - Ford

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over-Early Start · 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-13vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeWon 10
W#1 DoublesMandy Smith / Amira Tolles vs Mary Jo Pecoraro / Angie Vorndran6-3, 6-1
2021-12-06vs Fee - LuerWon 20
W#1 DoublesMandy Smith / Lina Ruhlman vs Erin Conway / Deborah Phillips6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAmira Tolles vs Katharyn Luer6-1, 6-0
2021-11-29vs TTC - LeiterLost 01
L#1 SinglesAmira Tolles vs Courtney Thomassen2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-11-15vs TTC -TaylorWon 10
W#1 DoublesLina Ruhlman / Amira Tolles vs Trisha Watson / Lisa Shaffer6-2, 6-0
2021-11-08Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmira Tolles vs Anna Zubovskaya6-2, 6-1
2021-11-01vs Rockledge -Winner - KubeWon 10
W#1 DoublesKiana Zanganeh / Amira Tolles vs Suzanne Kube / Deena Helton6-4, 7-5
2021-10-25Won 10
W#1 SinglesAmira Tolles vs Sarah Brown6-3, 6-2
2021-10-18vs TTC - LeiterLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Jiborn / Amira Tolles vs Courtney Thomassen / Emily Criste6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2021-10-11vs TTC -TaylorLost 01
L#1 DoublesMandy Smith / Tandy Baerst vs Susan Wilkes / Carol Whalen7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-10-04vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 10
W#1 DoublesAmira Tolles / Kiana Zanganeh vs Julianne Moore / Kathleen Groff6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult Early-Start 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Amira Tolles
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 44% · published 4
3.24
Veronica Scott
published
3.18
Dana Saunders
published 3.5
3.13
Darien Lawrence
published 3.5
2.80
Mandy Smith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Amy McCleery
published 3
2.65
Caroline Jiborn
published 3
2.45
Linda White
published
2.43
Jan Page
published
2.43
Marianne Fraser
published
Marie Ratliff
published
Tandy Baerst
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amira Tolles
91W–33L career · 9 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
Veronica Scott
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Dana Saunders
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Darien Lawrence
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Mandy Smith
90W–80L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Amy McCleery
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Caroline Jiborn
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Linda White
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.45
Jan Page
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Marianne Fraser
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
0%71%29%
2.43
Marie Ratliff
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tandy Baerst
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.