Teams

Curtiss/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-17vs Daly/MemphisWon 40
W#1 DoublesMegan Dillon / Audrey Darrohn vs Carey Pontius / Rebecca Hinds2-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKathryn Curtiss vs Collette Reid-Rice6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTanner Baker / Sydney Tomes Steffner vs Brandi Tomlinson / Ann Pretzer6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesHart Kelman / Hallie Templeton vs Francis Mcrae / Dana Daly7-5, 6-2
2024-11-03vs Rowe/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesTanner Baker / Sydney Tomes Steffner vs Ashley Adams / Huxley Maury1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAnn Church vs Katherine Garrott1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMadalyn McClelland / Allie Sloane vs Mandy Powell / Lauren Keras6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKathryn Curtiss vs Leslie Walsh6-1, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSumner Jefferson / Victoria Mansfield vs Natalie McClure / Beth Hays3-6, 6-7
2024-10-27vs Nair/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesAnn Church / Hallie Templeton vs Cathy Poulin / Lisa Monahan2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesHart Kelman / Kiersten Carey vs Lisa Evans / Melissa Taras6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSydney Tomes Steffner vs Ann Yackel4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Darrohn / Allie Sloane vs Kathye Sbravati / Molly Schmidt4-6, 4-6
2024-10-20vs Malone/MemphisLost 14
L#1 DoublesMadalyn McClelland / Audrey Darrohn vs Bradi Bair / Sydney Matsumoto1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesVictoria Mansfield vs Gina Ramos0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Curtiss / Megan Dillon vs Susan Northen-Lacy / Xiaoqun Akers6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesHart Kelman vs Lynn Henderson2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKiersten Carey / Sydney Tomes Steffner vs Amy Worrell Sterling / Clare Santos6-0, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.52 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Kathryn Curtiss
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.65
Madalyn McClelland
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Sumner Jefferson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Allie Sloane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.52
Sydney Tomes Steffner
usually #2 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Victoria Mansfield
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.52
Audrey Darrohn
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Hallie Templeton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.48
Kiersten Carey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Ann Church
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.38
Hart Kelman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.27
Tanner Baker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allie Sloane + Kathryn Curtiss404 matchesnot enough data
Kiersten Carey + Hart Kelman134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Curtiss
10W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
Madalyn McClelland
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
Sumner Jefferson
2W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Allie Sloane
6W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.58
Sydney Tomes Steffner
9W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.52
Victoria Mansfield
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
3
Audrey Darrohn
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.52
Hallie Templeton
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50
Kiersten Carey
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.48
3
Ann Church
3W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.42
Hart Kelman
7W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Tanner Baker
11W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.