Teams

Sports Mall-Team Fun

2025 Winter League-Saturday · 2.5W Saturday

11 players · average NTRP 2.64 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-22vs Liberty Park Tennis-En FuegoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeghan Boyd / Jenna DeLong vs Katie Rose / Blake Bohe2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHailey Jensen / Anna Eschler vs Alicia Miller / Lacey Johnson4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLindsay Roth / Rebecca Rynders vs Shelly Kaihatu / Maddison Weber6-1, 6-1
2025-03-15vs Cottonwood Club-Special KWon 30
W#1 DoublesHailey Jensen / Jenna DeLong vs Kristin Rocke / Kristin Hutchins6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRebecca Rynders / Karen Weyman vs Kristin Bretz / Elise Matthews6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMadison Milligan / Tejaswini Vaidya vs Holly Ricker / Kylee Bryson6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Milligan / Karen Weyman vs Adri Soffe / Shelby Hales6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRebecca Rynders / Anna Eschler vs Ashley Theodore / Angela Fletcher6-3, 6-2
2025-02-22vs Salt Lake Tennis-WilliamsLost 12
W#1 DoublesJenna DeLong / Lindsay Roth vs Mckenna Kimball / Pat Williams6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOlivia Moreton / Karen Weyman vs Paige Smathers / Carissa Monroy6-4, 2-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAnn Chenoweth / Rebecca Rynders vs Yue Liu / Lisa Sehy2-6, 1-6
2025-02-08vs Liberty Park Tennis-En FuegoWon 10
W#3 DoublesHailey Jensen / Rebecca Rynders vs Debbie Beckstrom / Janelle Freund7-5, 3-3, 1-0
2025-02-01vs Cottonwood Club-Special KWon 30
W#1 DoublesMeghan Boyd / Tejaswini Vaidya vs Lindsay Sparks / Kristine Johnson6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJenna DeLong / Karen Weyman vs Kristin Bretz / Brittany Pope6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMadison Milligan / Anna Eschler vs Elise Matthews / Crystal Connors6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.44 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Jenna DeLong
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.58
Lindsay Roth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.57
Rebecca Rynders
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.48
Tejaswini Vaidya
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.42
Madison Milligan
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 2.5
2.40
Karen Weyman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Hailey Jensen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Ann Chenoweth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Anna Eschler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Olivia Moreton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Meghan Boyd
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Madison Milligan + Hailey Jensen9360% games+15.0% vs expected
Madison Milligan + Karen Weyman6070% games+5.2% vs expected
Lindsay Roth + Meghan Boyd3450% games+4.8% vs expected
Madison Milligan + Meghan Boyd4353% games+1.8% vs expected
Olivia Moreton + Karen Weyman3845% games−3.1% vs expected
Madison Milligan + Lindsay Roth4264% gamesnot enough data
Jenna DeLong + Rebecca Rynders4258% gamesnot enough data
Ann Chenoweth + Olivia Moreton134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jenna DeLong
66W–45L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
2.81
Lindsay Roth
26W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
2.5
Rebecca Rynders
33W–23L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.57
3
Tejaswini Vaidya
34W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
2.5
Madison Milligan
60W–74L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%73%27%
2.42
Karen Weyman
30W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%77%23%
2.40
2.5
Hailey Jensen
36W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Ann Chenoweth
5W–45L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Anna Eschler
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Olivia Moreton
85W–121L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91
Meghan Boyd
12W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.