Teams

4-MIsrael-CHCC

2022 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-05-09vs 3-LGilchrist-CHCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Jennifer Woods vs Linda Gilchrist / Jessica Meadows6-3, 6-1
2022-04-27vs 2-LWollman-CHCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesMelissa Israel / Sarah Sapeta vs Janis Tillman / Stacey Lange4-6, 2-6
2022-04-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Sapeta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-04-04vs 1-MLong-Eno-40+ 3.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSara Morgan / Sarah Sapeta vs Lisa Montague / Beverly Fedewa1-6, 4-6
2022-03-28vs 2-LWollman-CHCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Sapeta vs Stacey Lange6-3, 6-4
2022-03-21vs 3-LGilchrist-CHCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Jennifer Woods vs Meredith Fitch / Leslye Rood6-1, 6-0
2022-02-28vs 1-MLong-Eno-40+ 3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Sapeta / Jennifer Woods vs Lisa Montague / Mary T Long6-4, 6-2
2022-02-21vs 5-EEverett-HVCCWon 10
W#1 SinglesSarah Sapeta vs Betsy Euler6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women-Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Jennifer Woods
published
2.85
Jennifer Yost
published
2.83
Kathryn Chan
published
2.82
Melissa Israel
published
2.76
Sarah Sapeta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3
2.71
Sara Morgan
published
2.37
Maggie Hanes
published
Karen Sapir
published
Kit Carson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Woods + Sarah Sapeta213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Woods
17W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.07
Jennifer Yost
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
2.85
Kathryn Chan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Melissa Israel
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Sarah Sapeta
95W–89L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.76
Sara Morgan
10W–23L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Maggie Hanes
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
84%16%<1%
2.37
Karen Sapir
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kit Carson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.