Teams

DdeArmas (Firethorne)

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-08vs JJohnson/MDwyer (Carmel)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBreck Lindley / Danielle Shealy vs Callie Tucker / Liz Rabidou1-6, 2-6
2023-05-01vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Sawrey / Danielle Shealy vs Katie Cronin / Joanne Joliet6-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Alicia Fink0-6, 4-6
2023-04-17vs KAllen/KRichards (Raintree)Split 11
L#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Erin Moser2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDanielle Shealy / Kathy Sawrey vs Renee Ziemianski / Lee Steadman2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-15vs JJohnson/MDwyer (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Lattanzi / Elizabeth Kyle vs Kathryn Klaus / Jennifer Johnson4-6, 4-6
2023-04-10vs KHeidkamp (PCC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBreck Lindley / Danielle Shealy vs Kristin Heidkamp / Joan Bullard6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-03-27vs CMiles (Queens)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Maria Solorzano6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-03-13vs SGrindle (WSRC)Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Kathleen O'Donnell6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-06vs KCronin/AFink (Piper Glen)Split 11
L#1 DoublesDanielle Shealy / Joanne Hurley vs Allyson McDonough / Lori Broome5-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Alicia Fink7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Breck Lindley
published 3.5
2.98
Caroline Lattanzi
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.94
Meghan Rawlings
published
2.89
Elizabeth Kyle
published
2.89
Julianne Gray
published
2.87
Diane Hegele
published 3
2.82
Patty Swan
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Danielle Shealy
usually #1 Doubles 54%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published 3
2.71
Brenda Cage
published 3
2.71
Jennifer McCoy
published
2.56
Dorie de Armas
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer McCoy + Julianne Gray8453% games+5.7% vs expected
Dorie de Armas + Patty Swan1641% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Breck Lindley
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Caroline Lattanzi
54W–39L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%54%46%
2.98
Meghan Rawlings
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
Elizabeth Kyle
9W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Julianne Gray
15W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Diane Hegele
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%18%
2.87
3
Patty Swan
64W–80L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Danielle Shealy
91W–90L career · 13 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Brenda Cage
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Jennifer McCoy
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Dorie de Armas
40W–90L career · 8 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.