Teams

If you ain't first, you're last

Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.58 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-05vs Honey DeucesLost 01
L#2 DoublesJuan Cardenas / Emily Hoy vs David Clausen / Lien Nguyen1-6, 1-6
2026-07-25vs Honey DeucesLost 02
L#2 DoublesChris Madsen / Emily Hoy vs Rolando Mascareno / Abhilasha Vishwanath1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesClaudia Villari / Juan Cardenas vs Tyler McCusker / Tanvi Narendran0-6, 0-6
2026-07-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMarc Avalos / Claudia Villari vs Derek Kropp / Tanvi Narendran2-6, 4-6
2026-07-25vs Honey DeucesLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarc Avalos / Jill Endres vs Derek Kropp / Yayoi Junior4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJuan Cardenas / Emily Hoy vs Luke Kauffman / Esme Martin2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChris Madsen / Tiffany Hodges vs Lien Nguyen / David Clausen2-6, 6-7
2026-07-12vs Honey DeucesSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKia Choi / Brian Ravesloot vs Tanvi Narendran / Tyler McCusker3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEmily Hoy / Juan Cardenas vs Yayoi Junior / David Clausen2-6, 3-6
2026-07-11vs Honey DeucesWon 20
W#1 DoublesKia Choi / Brian Ravesloot vs Luke Kauffman / Esme Martin7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMarc Avalos / Claudia Villari vs Lien Nguyen / David Clausen7-6, 7-5
2026-06-28vs Honey DeucesWon 10
W#3 DoublesKia Choi / Brian Ravesloot vs Yayoi Junior / Derek Kropp4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 10.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Honey Deuces5216514152
2If you ain't first, you're last2551634240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.40 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.59
Kia Choi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.59
Kyle Seyler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.59
Brian Ravesloot
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.49
Marek Dubovec
published
4.45
Claudia Villari
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.39
Arturo Prieto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.39
Chris Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.39
David Hallinan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.35
Juan Cardenas
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.35
Jill Endres
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
4.33
Tiffany Hodges
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
4.27
Emily Hoy
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
4.25
Marc Avalos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.12
Andrew Kilpatrick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Hallinan + Jill Endres12070% games+11.7% vs expected
Claudia Villari + Arturo Prieto8751% games−0.3% vs expected
Chris Madsen + Tiffany Hodges4160% gamesnot enough data
Andrew Kilpatrick + Tiffany Hodges224 matchesnot enough data
Claudia Villari + Chris Madsen314 matchesnot enough data
Brian Ravesloot + Kia Choi303 matchesnot enough data
Juan Cardenas + Emily Hoy033 matchesnot enough data
Emily Hoy + Chris Madsen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kia Choi
82W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.59
Kyle Seyler
35W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
4.59
5
Brian Ravesloot
38W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.59
Marek Dubovec
30W–24L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.49
4.5
Claudia Villari
87W–51L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Arturo Prieto
109W–67L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Chris Madsen
182W–72L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
David Hallinan
62W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
4.39
Juan Cardenas
142W–73L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
4.35
Jill Endres
87W–30L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
Tiffany Hodges
65W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
4.33
Emily Hoy
43W–31L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Marc Avalos
27W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.25
4.5
Andrew Kilpatrick
65W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
4.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.