Teams

SMASH

2025 OKCAdult 18 & Over League · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.17 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-04vs OK/Chavez/18&over3.5WLost 05
L#1 DoublesSUSAN LOBSINGER / Kim Plant vs Kimberly Fox / Leila Fadaiepour2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKim Rengstorf vs Thi Nguyen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Mansell / Kathie Strickler vs Samantha Nguyen / Amy Pyles4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesKassadie Gastgeb vs Tiara Amantine4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesVanessa Leverette / Kim Teter vs Dulce Lucio / Lucia Chavez2-6, 3-6
2025-05-30vs DAWGSLost 13
L#1 DoublesKathy Mansell / Kim Rengstorf vs Callie Merritt / Lacy Remy4-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTessa Cook vs Lindsey Christopher6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRouye Choquette / Debbie Bray vs Alison Garrett / Olivia Mitchell0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKim Plant / Andrea Navarro vs Evan English / Maggie English1-6, 5-7
2025-04-30vs TEAM BEAST/ LADY BEASTWon 41
L#1 DoublesVanessa Leverette / Kathie Strickler vs Heather Herndon / Alyssa Mitchell7-6
W#1 SinglesTessa Cook vs Grace Mulligan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebbie Bray / Kim Teter vs Sonnie Maughan / Courteney Mack6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKassadie Gastgeb vs Jewels Martinez7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesKim Plant / SUSAN LOBSINGER vs Gwyneth Glanton / Cassie Gonzalez6-4, 6-4
2025-04-16vs All About That AceWon 31
W#1 DoublesTessa Cook / Kathie Strickler vs Kaylea Hopfer / Halie Summers6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNatalia Smith vs Abbey Adams6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesVanessa Leverette / Kim Rengstorf vs Chelsea Moore / Lauren Schwartz Winzeler6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAlisa Stewart / Jan Foisy vs Ali Weaver / Michelle Henderson2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Natalia Smith
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.32
Vanessa Leverette
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Debbie Bray
published 3.5
3.15
Kim Rengstorf
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.14
Tessa Cook
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.11
Kathy Mansell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Kim Teter
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Jan Foisy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.96
Kassadie Gastgeb
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Kathie Strickler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Rouye Choquette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Kim Plant
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Andrea Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Alisa Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
SUSAN LOBSINGER
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathie Strickler + Andrea Navarro4161% games+8.9% vs expected
Jan Foisy + Kathy Mansell11361% games+4.2% vs expected
Kim Teter + Alisa Stewart1741% games+2.0% vs expected
Kathie Strickler + Jan Foisy81051% games+0.6% vs expected
Rouye Choquette + Jan Foisy141052% games+0.3% vs expected
Kathie Strickler + Kathy Mansell2351% games−2.8% vs expected
Kim Plant + SUSAN LOBSINGER134 matchesnot enough data
Jan Foisy + Andrea Navarro224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalia Smith
55W–34L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Vanessa Leverette
44W–46L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Debbie Bray
27W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kim Rengstorf
39W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Tessa Cook
76W–71L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Kathy Mansell
99W–82L career · 6 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Kim Teter
16W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.10
Jan Foisy
49W–48L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Kassadie Gastgeb
34W–17L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Kathie Strickler
42W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
Rouye Choquette
31W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.86
Kim Plant
39W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.79
3
Andrea Navarro
34W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Alisa Stewart
45W–73L career · 1 line in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
SUSAN LOBSINGER
67W–103L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%47%53%
2.51

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.