Teams

Team 1 Unstrung Heroes

2026 NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-04vs Team 5 CourtmastersLost 02
L#1 DoublesNobuyasu Sugimoto / Miguel Mendoza vs Ilya Shapiro / Johnathan Missner0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCraig Pickering / Konrad Huppi vs Alex Bittner / STEPHEN STANDING1-6, 3-6
2026-03-29vs Team 5 CourtmastersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Nobuyasu Sugimoto vs Jay Bernardo / Alex Bittner6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTyler Duvall / Chungchi Yao vs John Sobieray / Phil Reed6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKonrad Huppi / Miguel Mendoza vs STEPHEN STANDING / David Teale6-4, 6-3
2026-03-21vs Team 3 Ageless All StarsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKonrad Huppi / Nobuyasu Sugimoto vs Mark Jenkins / John Zott6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChungchi Yao / Tyler Duvall vs John H / Thomas Zavilla6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Larson / Miguel Mendoza vs Bill Copley / Robert Etheridge7-6, 6-3
2026-03-15vs Team 4 WGCC HitmenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Larson / Konrad Huppi vs Gregory Golden / Jay Ghazal3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Paul Reid vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-03-07vs Team 4 WGCC HitmenSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristopher Damboise / Tyler Duvall vs Jason Dalley / Alan Eisenberg1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPaul Reid / David Larson vs Rod Volz / Michael Poth4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-18vs Team 2 Belle Haven 3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesTyler Duvall / Christopher Damboise vs Raul Cancelado / Shariff Elsheikh6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Chungchi Yao vs John Alspaugh / Michael Lambert2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Larson / Raymond Barry vs Matthew Skladany / Kevin Mack0-6, 4-6
2026-02-14vs Team 3 Ageless All StarsWon 21
W#1 DoublesKonrad Huppi / Christopher Damboise vs Chandler Fox / John H2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPaul Reid / David Larson vs Benjamin Utech / Robert Etheridge7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCraig Pickering / Chungchi Yao vs Ted Berner / John Zott2-6, 2-6
2026-01-07vs Team 2 Belle Haven 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMajed Hamawy / Konrad Huppi vs Tim Kane / Richard Sterba5-7, 4-4
L#2 DoublesMiguel Mendoza / Mark Lavoie vs Ryan Meerstein / Abe Adams2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Ramos / Raymond Barry vs Raul Cancelado / Shariff Elsheikh6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NOVA Doubles 40 & Over Winter 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Team 5 Courtmasters7117720184
2Team 4 WGCC Hitmen53141020194
3Team 2 Belle Haven 3.044141021184
4Team 1 Unstrung Heroes44111328221
5Team 3 Ageless All Stars0842041268

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
David Larson
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Majed Hamawy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
William Ramos
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Konrad Huppi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.88
Nobuyasu Sugimoto
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.83
Tyler Duvall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.75
Chungchi Yao
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.72
Paul Reid
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
Miguel Mendoza
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.70
Mark Lavoie
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Christopher Damboise
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Raymond Barry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Craig Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Majed Hamawy + Chungchi Yao141152% games−12.8% vs expected
Chungchi Yao + Raymond Barry134 matchesnot enough data
Konrad Huppi + Mark Lavoie033 matchesnot enough data
Paul Reid + David Larson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
David Larson
7W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
3
Majed Hamawy
379W–516L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
William Ramos
40W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Konrad Huppi
13W–20L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Nobuyasu Sugimoto
47W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
2.88
Tyler Duvall
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Chungchi Yao
77W–97L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Paul Reid
16W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
Miguel Mendoza
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Mark Lavoie
4W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Christopher Damboise
5W–2L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66
Raymond Barry
2W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
3
Craig Pickering
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.