Teams

Net Blazers

2021 Prince George's Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-07-24vs PG Tennis and BeerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Zehr / Tom Smith vs Tony Chin / Ron Best7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAvraham Amram vs Jeffrey Brown6-4, 3-5, 0-1
2021-07-18vs PG Tennis and BeerLost 12
L#1 DoublesAvraham Amram / Habib Sherif vs Clifton Wynter / Dan Fredman3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Tom Smith vs Marcus Moore / Segun Eubanks6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Zehr / Donnie Reyes vs Damion Trasada / Larry Johnson3-6, 3-6
2021-07-17vs PG Tennis and BeerLost 03
L#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Tom Smith vs Clifton Wynter / Dan Fredman3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAvraham Amram vs Jeffrey Brown3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDonnie Reyes / Michael Zehr vs Tony Chin / Ron Best1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-07-11vs PG Tennis and BeerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Richard Sexton vs Dan Fredman / Clifton Wynter1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAmit Kapadia / Michael Zehr vs Barrett Partington / Daniel Scott6-3, 5-6
2021-06-27vs PG Tennis and BeerWon 10
W#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Richard Sexton vs Clifton Wynter / Tony Chin6-4, 6-4
2021-06-20vs PG Tennis and BeerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRichard Sexton / Demetrius Crawford vs Marcus Moore / Jeffrey Brown6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHabib Sherif / Avraham Amram vs Matthew Ganney / Barrett Partington6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-19vs PG Tennis and BeerSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAvraham Amram vs Stanley Nazaire6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Habib Sherif vs Ron Best / Yong Kim2-6, 5-7
2021-06-13vs PG Tennis and BeerWon 20
W#1 DoublesDemetrius Crawford / Richard Sexton vs Segun Eubanks / Clifton Wynter7-5, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAvraham Amram vs Daniel Scott6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Richard Sexton
published
Amit Kapadia
published 4
3.73
Demetrius Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.67
Avraham Amram
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.62
Michael Zehr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Demetrius Crawford + Richard Sexton2543% games+2.3% vs expected
Demetrius Crawford + Michael Zehr4548% gamesnot enough data
Demetrius Crawford + Avraham Amram3343% gamesnot enough data
Avraham Amram + Michael Zehr4164% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Sexton
32W–36L career · no lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
3.92
4
Amit Kapadia
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Demetrius Crawford
204W–161L career · 7 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Avraham Amram
100W–70L career · 6 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Michael Zehr
90W–93L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%82%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.