Teams

Yadkin/DeYoung/18+3.5 Mixed

2024 Yadkin Valley Mixed 18 & Over · Mixed 3.5 - Thursday Evening

15 players · average NTRP 3.69 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-08-01vs Yadkin/Hinshelwood/18+3.5 MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Gallagher / Adam Montessi vs JoAnn White / Jacobo Araujo Nieto6-3, 6-1
2024-07-30vs Yadkin/FCC/18+3.5 MixedWon 10
W#3 DoublesMeghan de Young / Adam Montessi vs Allison Schleutker / Brad Poindexter6-0, 6-0
2024-06-09vs Yadkin/Backus/18+3.5 MixedWon 10
W#2 DoublesAdam Montessi / Emily McMillen vs Candace Bowman / Joseph Kulits6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 - Thursday Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Mark Yamane
published
4.08
Emily McMillen
published 4
4.04
Adam Montessi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.95
Matthew Wright
published
3.71
3.63
Daniel Hege
published 4
3.58
Clarissa Tatum
published 3.5
3.57
Joe Peele
published
3.53
Laura Varsik
published
3.47
Danielle Wright
published 3.5
3.47
Meghan de Young
published
3.46
Caroline Gallagher
published 3.5
3.29
Kim Haynes
published
2.95
Blake Suess
published 3
Neil Bishop
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily McMillen + Adam Montessi6073% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Yamane
17W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%12%88%
4.15
4
Emily McMillen
28W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
4.08
4
Adam Montessi
126W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
4.04
Matthew Wright
32W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.95
4
Davis Phanthalack
32W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Daniel Hege
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Clarissa Tatum
62W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.58
Joe Peele
15W–10L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.57
Laura Varsik
56W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Danielle Wright
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Meghan de Young
43W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Caroline Gallagher
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kim Haynes
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3
Blake Suess
23W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Neil Bishop
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.