Teams

Moore-C COVE

2025 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-06-07vs Kanawha Kweenz - KaufmannLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatie Hendrick / Joslyn Wolberg vs Virginia Kaufmann / Stacey Hill6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMargaret Moore vs Kate Garitz6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKim Punt / Kendall Omohundro vs Anna Holloway / Anna Hatfield1-6, 1-6
2025-05-31vs Mighty MAC - NovakLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Parker / Margaret Moore vs Evelyn Cochran / Shivon Sood6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJoslyn Wolberg vs Tatenda Mupfudze4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Knepper / Kim Punt vs Lauren Garbade / Katy Foucar-Szocki1-6, 2-6
2025-05-26vs Mancini TinisLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Cross / Emily Ashton vs Fenton Crowther / Elizabeth Turner3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmanda Parker vs Melissa Lloyd5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKatherine Fillmore / Katie Hendrick vs Susan Bond / Erin Nord0-6, 0-6
2025-05-10vs Avalon LuchsingerWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatherine Fillmore / Jaime Budny vs Jennifer Levine / Shannon White2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJoslyn Wolberg vs Jordan Sturgis6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Hendrick / Amber Knepper vs Morgan Pilkington / Jana Braswell3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-03vs Chestnut Oaks 2.5 CoyleWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoslyn Wolberg / Katie Hendrick vs Heather Waltenbaugh / Meghan Gemmill6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJaime Budny vs Emily Frost6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmber Knepper / Amy Cross vs Leah Beard / Katie Rose2-6, 3-6
2025-04-26vs SCC FoleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmanda Parker / Kim Punt vs Allison Moore / Becca Nagle3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Ashton vs Michelle Foley0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKendall Omohundro / Margaret Moore vs Abby Getzel / Leslie Percy6-4, 6-2
2025-04-19vs ACAC Preusser/Adkins Slice GirlsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMargaret Moore / Emily Ashton vs Julia Preusser / Catherine Long1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmanda Parker vs Taryn Adkins6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Cross / Kendall Omohundro vs Kimberlee Pepple / Tyler Hunt0-6, 0-6
2025-04-13vs Our Tennis Era - Sampson HCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatherine Fillmore / Emily Ashton vs Samantha Mcclellan / Amanda OConnell0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAmy Cross vs Denise Saunders0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJaime Budny / Amber Knepper vs Heather Sabharwal / Rebecca Wetherly1-6, 2-6
2025-04-05vs Woodlake-CorazziniWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Parker / Amy Cross vs Amy Gamulo / Rachael Seiler1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMargaret Moore vs Kim Corazzini6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesEmily Ashton / Kendall Omohundro vs Lisa Seiler / Elizabeth Snow2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Margaret Moore
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.34
Joslyn Wolberg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Amanda Parker
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.18
Katie Hendrick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.12
Amy Cross
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
1.96
Kim Punt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
1.94
Jaime Budny
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.91
Emily Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
1.79
Amber Knepper
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.68
Kendall Omohundro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Katherine Fillmore
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cross + Emily Ashton123 matchesnot enough data
Joslyn Wolberg + Katie Hendrick213 matchesnot enough data
Kim Punt + Kendall Omohundro033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Moore
12W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%39%61%
2.54
Joslyn Wolberg
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.34
2.5
Amanda Parker
4W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%90%10%
2.33
Katie Hendrick
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Amy Cross
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Kim Punt
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Jaime Budny
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
2.5
Emily Ashton
1W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91
2.5
Amber Knepper
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.79
Kendall Omohundro
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.68
Katherine Fillmore
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.