Teams

RHCC GREEN

2023 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-13vs NJ BLACKWon 21
W#1 DoublesKirstin McConnell / Melissa Pugh vs Michelle Halliday / Leah Vladika6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesCarrie Warren / Aimee Petri vs Erin Manzolillo / Stephanie Shawn1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesRachel Adams / Susan Weese vs Jennifer Lyons / Elizabeth Shields6-4, 7-5
2023-06-06vs LTC-D REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesKirstin McConnell / Rachel Adams vs Ellen Muller / Christie Bibeau6-0, 6-3
2023-05-30vs KC-RH WHITELost 02
L#1 DoublesMelissa Pugh / Susan Weese vs Kathleen Schuster / Julie Hobart0-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAimee Petri / Kirstin McConnell vs Sarah Bryan / Amy Shaw4-6, 0-6
2023-05-23vs NJ BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesJulia McVey / Aimee Petri vs Julie Lochner / Molly Balmes0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Adams / Kirstin McConnell vs Becky Myers / Kathy Peterson6-3, 6-2
2023-05-16vs MC ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesKirstin McConnell / Susan Weese vs Ana Bland / Natalie Sanso4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-05-09vs HIW BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesAimee Petri / Rebecca Strobel vs Doreen Evans / Nora Alby6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKirstin McConnell / Carrie Warren vs Mieke Scripps / Susie Shipley4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Carrie Warren
published 4
3.60
Melissa Pugh
published
3.31
Kirstin McConnell
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.30
Rebecca Strobel
published
3.30
Aimee Petri
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.19
Rachel Adams
published
3.16
Julia McVey
published
3.09
Susan Weese
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.88
2.86
Michele Castle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Pugh + Carrie Warren4164% games+4.0% vs expected
Kirstin McConnell + Susan Weese134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carrie Warren
25W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
Melissa Pugh
22W–10L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.60
3.5
Kirstin McConnell
66W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Rebecca Strobel
35W–31L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Aimee Petri
136W–73L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Rachel Adams
17W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Julia McVey
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Susan Weese
55W–58L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Amelia Hendrickson
11W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Michele Castle
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.