Teams

Glenmore

2023 Charlottesville Combo · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.67 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-08-29vs BHSCLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Haney / Anna Minutella vs Leigh Rinckel / Laura Hilliard4-6, 0-6
2023-08-24vs Forest LakesWon 10
W#2 DoublesCatherine Haney / Nerissa Rouzer vs Judy Roy / Eunhee Lee6-3, 6-1
2023-08-15vs FarmingtonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Haney / Nerissa Rouzer vs Jenn Crutchfield Worth / Gina Senese6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2023-08-10vs ACAC - Dealer's ChoiceLost 01
L#2 DoublesCatherine Haney / Nerissa Rouzer vs Karin Jones / Blair Hubbard1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-08-08vs BHSCLost 01
L#1 DoublesCatherine Haney / Andrea Richardson vs Leigh Rinckel / Kailey Boatright4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Catherine Haney
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.69
Jane Touzalin
published
2.68
Nerissa Rouzer
published
2.45
Patricia Clifford
published
2.38
Julie Nash
published
Brooke Vergales
published 2.5
Christine Faulkner
published 2.5
2.07
Kathleen Edwards
published
Rebecca Bushey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Edwards + Nerissa Rouzer5156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Catherine Haney
39W–36L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
2.80
Jane Touzalin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
2.69
Nerissa Rouzer
19W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%8%92%
2.68
Patricia Clifford
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%65%35%
2.45
Julie Nash
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.38
2.5
Brooke Vergales
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
2.5
Christine Faulkner
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathleen Edwards
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Rebecca Bushey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.