← Teams

THPRD-Soiffer

2025 Mixed 55 & Over · 8.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.85 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Patrick Harkin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Julie Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.56
Hong Jones
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.54
Joel Fenner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.54
Donna Kennish
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Danny Denning
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.46
Neil Soiffer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
Edmund Yuan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Lily Looi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.27
Shawn Boyce
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
Results8 ties
2025-05-10Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesJoel Fenner / Angie Lee vs William Haynes / Hong Allen6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLily Looi / Shawn Boyce vs Mitchell Whitehurst / Tina Clancy6-4, 6-2
2025-05-04Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesDonna Kennish / Mike Hyne vs Frank Olson / Carol Devencenzi6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngie Lee / Edmund Yuan vs Robert Ferek / Michelle Jobe6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-04-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCarla Wheeler / Shawn Boyce vs Lisa Lyon / Mark King6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngie Lee / Danny Denning vs Libby North / Scott Powers6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Hanson / Patrick Harkin vs Jan Rothert / Keith Johnson6-3, 7-6
2025-04-19Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDanny Denning / Donna Kennish vs Mark King / Christy Strange6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Angie Lee vs Lisa Lyon / Chris Thoman6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoel Fenner / Julie Hanson vs David Finkelman / Janelle Laurila7-6, 6-0
2025-04-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Angie Lee vs Craig Mills / Kris Kelly-Koster6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJoel Fenner / Hong Jones vs Christine Wall / Tom Lonergan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Kennish / Patrick Harkin vs Don Mcbride / Tara Guimont6-1, 6-4
2025-04-13Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesNeil Soiffer / Angie Lee vs Scott Eliason / Katherine Kralj6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEdmund Yuan / Carla Wheeler vs Liz DelPlato / Robert Ferek6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDanny Denning / Hong Jones vs Crystal Bryant / Frank Olson7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-06Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesJoel Fenner / Julie Hanson vs William Haynes / Hong Allen1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPatrick Harkin / Carla Wheeler vs Peter Schulte / Tina Clancy7-5, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHong Jones / Edmund Yuan vs Todd Kuribayashi / Carol Chiu6-4, 6-2
2025-03-30Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesLily Looi / Neil Soiffer vs Karen McNairy / Mike McNairy4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJulie Hanson / Mike Hyne vs Marie Picard / Jack Schunk6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarla Wheeler / Shawn Boyce vs Carrie Fisher / Quanwang Wei6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Patrick Harkin
88W–69L career
not enough data
—
4
Julie Hanson
47W–64L career
11%89%0%
3.59
4
Hong Jones
26W–50L career
23%77%0%
3.56
3.5
Joel Fenner
27W–18L career · type S
0%71%29%
3.54
4
Donna Kennish
137W–120L career
23%77%0%
3.54
4
Danny Denning
64W–77L career
37%63%0%
3.48
4
Neil Soiffer
96W–138L career
44%56%0%
3.46
3.5
Edmund Yuan
113W–86L career
0%96%4%
3.40
4
Lily Looi
77W–80L career
85%15%0%
3.31
3.5
Shawn Boyce
170W–125L career
0%99%0%
3.27

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.