Teams

Team 4 10s Junkies

2025 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday 4.0 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.94 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-06-12vs Team 1 Tennis SharksWon 31
W#1 DoublesBeth Kaufman / Renee Wall vs Kari Whitney / Griffin Mauk6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLaura Sagen vs Jerien Okoh-Tisch0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Fishel / Christina Schinner vs Karyn DeVito / Marguerite McFadden6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJessica Egenrieder / Lisa Zimmerman vs Elizabeth Clarke / Laurie Peacock6-4, 6-0
2025-06-02vs Team 5 The Pace MakersWon 30
W#1 DoublesRenee Wall / Jessica Egenrieder vs Denise Weinig / Kristin Satterfield6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJill Poretz / Christina Schinner vs Becky Yang / Holly Rasmussen6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJennifer Larner / Laura Sagen vs Julie Moellering / Jennifer Gatewood6-4, 6-0
2025-05-15vs Team 5 The Pace MakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesJessica Egenrieder / Christina Schinner vs Kate Clancey / ELIZABETH DELANEY6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPaige Fishel / Laura Sagen vs Beth Taylor / Julie Moellering7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesRenee Wall / Lisa Zimmerman vs Odette Clark Campbell / Susan Velasco7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-05-08vs Team 3 Spring ChicksLost 13
L#1 DoublesWendy Hopkins / Laura Sagen vs Annie Richardson / Erin Green2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMichelle Abalos vs Dana Moss0-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Walther / Jessica Egenrieder vs Nancy Scully / Stephanie Anderson5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRenee Wall / Lu Ann Rubenstein vs Greta Davies / Melissa Laskin1-6, 6-7
2025-05-01vs Team 8 Nets NutsWon 21
W#1 DoublesJill Poretz / Christina Schinner vs Kay Bransford / Jeanne Baily4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Sagen vs Margaret Sita0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesWendy Hopkins / Jessica Egenrieder vs Cheryl Danner / Megan Burski Wells6-4, 6-4
2025-04-24vs Team 6 Ace RoyalesWon 20
W#2 DoublesJessica Egenrieder / Erin Kaplan vs Lorraine Tacinelli / Rayana Marker6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRenee Wall / Laura Sagen vs Jennifer Ayoub / Jeannie Ng6-2, 6-2
2025-04-21vs Team 7 Double TroubleSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJill Poretz / Christina Schinner vs Elizabeth Solander / Whitney Slahetka1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRenee Wall / Lisa Zimmerman vs Polly Middleton / Jennifer Ziehl6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-10vs Team 2 Net Angels 4.0Won 20
W#2 DoublesLu Ann Rubenstein / Jill Poretz vs Page Coleman / Christine Hopkins7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Zimmerman / Laura Sagen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Beth Kaufman
published 4
3.98
Michelle Abalos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.87
Erin Kaplan
published
3.85
Kristin Musselman
published
3.81
Christina Schinner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.73
Lu Ann Rubenstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Jessica Egenrieder
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.65
Paige Fishel
published
3.60
Jill Poretz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Elizabeth Young
published
3.59
Jennifer Larner
published
3.54
Renee Wall
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.42
Laura Sagen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
Tina Woods
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Kaplan + Beth Kaufman20365% games+4.4% vs expected
Jill Poretz + Christina Schinner15556% games+0.3% vs expected
Jessica Egenrieder + Laura Sagen2544% gamesnot enough data
Renee Wall + Jessica Egenrieder4159% gamesnot enough data
Renee Wall + Erin Kaplan314 matchesnot enough data
Jill Poretz + Renee Wall123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Beth Kaufman
42W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Michelle Abalos
145W–53L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Erin Kaplan
40W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.87
Kristin Musselman
25W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.85
4
Christina Schinner
227W–98L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Lu Ann Rubenstein
69W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.73
4
Jessica Egenrieder
162W–168L career · 6 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.65
Paige Fishel
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Jill Poretz
305W–215L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Elizabeth Young
36W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Jennifer Larner
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
4
Renee Wall
231W–249L career · 6 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Laura Sagen
164W–159L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Tina Woods
16W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.