Teams

LBK Public Allen

2022 Sarasota Adult 40 & Over Weekday · 4.0 W Tuesday

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-24vs Laurel Oak Better Late Than NeverLost 01
L#3 DoublesMolly Gleason / Helen Turner vs Marci Plattner / Susan Scarlett4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-17vs LBK Club LidskySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Maita / Sandy Schonhoff vs Lisa Tyson / Claudia Ellen Zimmerman6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHelen Turner / Holly Parker vs Deborah Lynch / Lisa Beckstein4-6, 6-7
2022-05-10vs LWN SherrSplit 11
L#2 DoublesHelen Turner / Molly Gleason vs Mary Gill / Deana Antonelli-Pike4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Jennifer Maita vs Nichole Bontell / Jenny Sherr6-1, 6-1
2022-04-26vs River Strand BeeneLost 02
L#1 SinglesKaren Nejdawi vs Kim Reiser1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Jennifer Maita vs Nancy Finman / Judi Wilson6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2022-04-19vs GT Bray RacquettesWon 10
W#1 SinglesKaren Nejdawi vs Carrie Scalcucci7-5, 6-4
2022-04-12vs Payne Park AllertonLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandy Schonhoff / Jennifer Maita vs Wendy Hillock / Cherie Lopez1-6, 2-6
2022-04-05vs Mission Valley MooneyWon 10
W#3 DoublesHelen Turner / Molly Gleason vs Halle Ghose / Patricia Moriarty6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 W Tuesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Helen Turner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Karen Nejdawi
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.12
Molly Gleason
published
Holly Parker
published
Jennifer Maita
published
Karen Jennings
published
Karen Kurgan
published
Kimberley Pelyk
published
Margaret Stanton
published
Sandy Schonhoff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sheliah Gruber
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Schonhoff + Helen Turner2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Helen Turner
34W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
Karen Nejdawi
41W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
Molly Gleason
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
Holly Parker
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Maita
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Jennings
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Kurgan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberley Pelyk
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Margaret Stanton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandy Schonhoff
45W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sheliah Gruber
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.