Teams

Dominion Bandits

2021 18 & OVER Fall Men · 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-12-04Lost 01
L#2 SinglesDaniel Millan vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ)4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-11-20Lost 01
L#1 SinglesFrank Gonzales vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ)3-6, 1-6
2021-11-13Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLuke Danielson vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ)6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-10-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDan Fischer / David Mueller vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ) / Anthony Rocco-Frank2-6, 4-6
2021-10-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLalo Rojas / Tim Collier vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ) / Arturo Samaniego4-6, 3-6
2021-09-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesBenjamin Lopez vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ)2-6, 2-6
2021-09-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRic Garcia Tagle / Andres Gonzalez vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ) / Bryce Seki3-6, 1-6
2021-09-11Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRyan Moe vs Nicholas Aguirre - (DQ)2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Carlos Alcantara
published 5
Huntington Snell
published 4.5
4.23
Adam Gitter
published 4.5
4.14
Nicholas Aguirre
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4.5
3.96
Todd Worrich
published
3.87
Ryan Kossman
published
3.86
John Cornelius
published
3.69
3.66
Mark Gitter
published
3.33
Tadd Chapman
published
Juan Carlos Diez
published
Rodrigo Marin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mark Gitter + John Cornelius3352% games−3.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Carlos Alcantara
55W–19L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
4.35
4.5
Huntington Snell
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Adam Gitter
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Nicholas Aguirre
26W–36L career · 14 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
4.14
Todd Worrich
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%63%37%
3.96
Ryan Kossman
24W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
John Cornelius
17W–17L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Anthony Rocco-Frank
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Mark Gitter
12W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.66
Tadd Chapman
7W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
Juan Carlos Diez
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rodrigo Marin
1W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.