Teams

Women - Tuesday

2026 Escambia SOCIAL RS Quads · RS Quads - Winter

23 players · average NTRP 2.65 / REGION_1

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for RS Quads - Winter have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Atchara Barrows
published 3
Donna Underdonk
published 3
2.63
Emily Plauche
published 2.5
2.59
Teresa Berg
published
2.42
Deryn Baggett
published 2.5
2.42
Sara Floyd
published
2.41
Brooke Crosby
published 2.5
2.39
Carrie Stevenson
published 2.5
2.31
Elizabeth Bemiss
published 2.5
2.28
Christina Walden
published 2.5
2.23
Sara Ratliff
published
2.21
Samantha Folkes
published
2.15
Kim Mcwherter
published
2.09
Linda Kuska
published
2.00
Julia Best
published
1.99
Shekka Drayton
published
1.97
Allie Crisco
published 2.5
1.77
Jennifer Richardson
published
1.77
Mariah Crawford
published
Pamela Munson
published
Teresa Beer
published
Venus Prince
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Ratliff + Brooke Crosby314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Rutherford
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Atchara Barrows
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Donna Underdonk
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Emily Plauche
8W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.63
Teresa Berg
17W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%23%77%
2.59
2.5
Deryn Baggett
4W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%73%27%
2.42
Sara Floyd
6W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Brooke Crosby
6W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Carrie Stevenson
3W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Elizabeth Bemiss
2W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Christina Walden
3W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Sara Ratliff
5W–25L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Samantha Folkes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Kim Mcwherter
6W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Linda Kuska
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Julia Best
0W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Shekka Drayton
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
2.5
Allie Crisco
1W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.97
Jennifer Richardson
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.77
Mariah Crawford
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.77
Pamela Munson
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Teresa Beer
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Venus Prince
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.