Teams

TYCC - C. Frier

2026 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-25vs Buckhorn - O. CantuWon 40
W#1 DoublesJames Baker / Jacob Munch vs Omar Cantu / Scott Tashman0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDan Burns vs John Field7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Mariani / Nicholas Fifer vs Harold Phillips / Luis Tur6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCarl Wilander / Todd Brandon vs David Jordy / Shawn Rasmussen6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesMichael Mariani / Jacob Munch vs Kalicharan Durgampudi / Aleksandar Seovic3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesNicholas Fifer vs Sean O'Brien6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJack Mitchell / Ed Swenson vs James Feeney / Ken Patrick6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDan Burns vs Joel Sparr6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBrent Saylor / Brian Conry vs Kenneth Sallings / Chris Ruskowski6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-10-11vs HCC - F. RussianLost 12
W#1 DoublesJames Baker / Michael Mariani vs Tom Foran / David Cairns7-5, 7-5
L#1 SinglesDan Burns vs Emon Abtahi1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCarl Wilander vs Alex Morales0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesJames Baker / Jacob Munch vs Ryan Hoecker / Darsh Shah7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesDan Burns vs Derek Colla6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesQuincy Bird / Carl Wilander vs Joe Fitzgerald / Johnny Moore6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesBrent Saylor vs Benjamin Schmid0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLee Gunn / Ed Swenson vs Benjamin Bee / Stuart Itzkowitz7-5, 6-3
2025-09-27vs Green Hunter Games X - M. WarrenLost 02
L#1 DoublesLee Gunn / Michael Mariani vs Kevin Wang / Ian Zhang3-6, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDan Burns vs Evan Butlig0-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesJacob Munch / James Baker vs Brandon Halm / Jason Lee7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesDan Burns vs Edwin Alejandro-Vega6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesQuincy Bird / Michael Mariani vs Max Collazo / Ken Chin7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesBrian Conry vs Brian Fearnow6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarl Wilander / Jack Mitchell vs Dustin Applebaum / David Ponraj3-6, 2-6
2025-09-13vs Sun City Center - K. JohnsonWon 41
W#1 DoublesJames Baker / Jacob Munch vs Brian Gray / Bob Astone6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDan Burns vs KEVIN JOHNSON1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChris Brandriff / Carl Wilander vs Wayne Keyes / Mark Nelson6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDean Franks vs Michael Nugent7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEd Swenson / Nicholas Fifer vs Vincent Petaccio / Stuart Fisher6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Carl Wilander
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Jacob Munch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Chris Brandriff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Nicholas Fifer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Ed Swenson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.33
Todd Brandon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Michael Mariani
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.25
Dan Burns
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Singles 14% · published 3.5
Cory Frier
published 3.5
3.21
Dean Franks
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Quincy Bird
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Lee Gunn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.12
Brent Saylor
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Brian Conry
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Hunt James
published
Jack Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Packer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dan Burns + Nicholas Fifer314 matchesnot enough data
Jacob Munch + Michael Mariani213 matchesnot enough data
Lee Gunn + Michael Mariani123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carl Wilander
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
3.56
Jacob Munch
24W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Chris Brandriff
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
Nicholas Fifer
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.35
Ed Swenson
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
Todd Brandon
7W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Michael Mariani
9W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Dan Burns
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cory Frier
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Dean Franks
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.21
Quincy Bird
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
3.14
Lee Gunn
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brent Saylor
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Brian Conry
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%74%25%
2.91
Hunt James
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jack Mitchell
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Packer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.