Teams

ERandall (Queens)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-02vs AVarner (Park Road)Won 20
W#2 SinglesPerri Freel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Kowalski / MacKie Dowell vs Krista Reardon / Heather Crysler0-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-04-11vs AVarner (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 SinglesPerri Freel vs Margy Pettit6-0, 6-0
2022-04-04vs AVarner (Park Road)Split 11
L#1 DoublesCathy Kowalski / MacKie Dowell vs Krista Reardon / Kristin Verrill1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEsther Farnham / Marci McGee vs Trista Holwager / Kathy Hatt7-6, 6-0
2022-03-28vs AVarner (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 SinglesCathy Kowalski vs Nily Willis6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPerri Freel / Emily Calloway vs Heather Crysler / Kristin Verrill6-1, 6-4
2022-03-21vs AVarner (Park Road)Split 11
W#1 DoublesPerri Freel / Emily Calloway vs Trista Holwager / Tracey Vacca Atkinson6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLori Woods / Marci McGee vs Kalee Muller / Krista Reardon2-6, 1-6
2022-03-07vs AVarner (Park Road)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKimberly Hanson / Marci McGee vs Krista Reardon / Naiema Frieson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKristin Hennessy / Cathy Kowalski vs Trista Holwager / Margy Pettit6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Jennifer Holshouser
published
4.51
Perri Freel
usually #1 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.38
Enid Randall
published 4.5
4.38
Emily Calloway
published 4.5
4.16
Esther Farnham
published 4.5
4.15
Lori Woods
published
4.13
Marci McGee
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.02
Cathy Kowalski
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
3.94
Elizabeth McCombs
published 4.5
Kimberly Hanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Perri Freel + Cathy Kowalski303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Holshouser
10W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.53
Perri Freel
67W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%46%54%
4.51
4.5
Enid Randall
28W–23L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Emily Calloway
13W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
4.38
4.5
Esther Farnham
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
Lori Woods
18W–14L career · no lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
4.15
Marci McGee
48W–32L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Cathy Kowalski
53W–44L career · 4 lines in 2022
44%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Elizabeth McCombs
19W–28L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.94
Kimberly Hanson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.