Teams

SFV - LLW Pickleball Rejects 4.0/Enciso

2025 Team Singles 18 SFV Summer · SFV 18+ Men 4.0 Singles

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-07vs SFV - Lone Servivors/Tovar & BadriLost 12
L#1 SinglesMiguel Ortiz-Reyes vs Zach Pomer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRichard Ortiz-Reyes vs Hamidreza Badri6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesOmar Enciso vs Teddy Tran2-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMiguel Ortiz-Reyes vs Peter Heinbecker7-5, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSheridan Sackett vs Sean Levy6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRichard Ortiz-Reyes vs Kevin Berson6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesOmar Enciso vs David McFarland6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesSheridan Sackett vs Pei Xu3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDeep Pulusani vs Philip Ferguson6-4, 6-1
2025-08-09vs SFV - Deep Strokes/YoushiaWon 20
W#1 SinglesOmar Enciso vs Corey Evett6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSheridan Sackett vs Jacob Youshia6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesDeep Pulusani vs Peter Heinbecker2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesOmar Enciso vs Sean Levy6-1, 6-0
W#3 SinglesSheridan Sackett vs Kevin Berson6-4, 6-1
2025-07-19vs SFV - GFT Singles/NamWon 30
W#1 SinglesDeep Pulusani vs Stephen Kim6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRichard Ortiz-Reyes vs SEUNG KIM6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesOmar Enciso vs Jason Nam6-4, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SFV 18+ Men 4.0 Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Sheridan Sackett
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
3.81
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.78
Deep Pulusani
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
3.78
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.73
Omar Enciso
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Ortiz-Reyes + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheridan Sackett
24W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.86
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.81
4
Deep Pulusani
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.78
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
22W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Omar Enciso
14W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.