Teams

Duckett 18 8.5

2025 Southern Combo Doubles 18 & Over - HSV · 8.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-09-15vs HU 8.5W 18 & Over (Presson)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMacklyn Hubbard / Mary Massey vs Kristina Stenberg / Jennifer Wood2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Jones / Makinly Baird vs Marissa Nixon / Kennedy Lewis1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Thomas / Erika Roman vs Mary O'Reilly / Stephanie Steele2-6, 2-6
2025-09-14vs HU 8.5W 18 & Over (Presson)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Hannah Carroll vs Marissa Nixon / Jennifer Wood6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSusan Short / Kasi Duckett vs Stephanie Steele / Mary O'Reilly6-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesHannah Witt / Macklyn Hubbard vs Hailey Simon / Kristina Stenberg0-6, 1-6
2025-09-13vs McCroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Carroll / Lina Leahy vs Molly McCrory / Leslie Pensa1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Jaeger / Susan Short vs Samantha Czarnecki / Emily Smith0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMakinly Baird / Erika Roman vs Mary Swinney / Lindsey Bax2-6, 1-6
2025-09-03vs McCroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesMakinly Baird / Mary Massey vs Laura Perry / Mary Hannah Robinson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Amy Thomas vs Mary Swinney / Molly McCrory4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMacklyn Hubbard / Erika Roman vs Cindy Luna / Janet Meko6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2025-08-25vs HU 8.5W 18 & Over (Presson)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Hannah Witt vs Mary O'Reilly / Jennifer Wood2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAmy Thomas / Susan Short vs Ginny Pylant / Morgan Coulter3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMacklyn Hubbard / Jennifer Jaeger vs Stephanie Steele / Anna Weber2-6, 5-7
2025-08-18vs McCroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesMacklyn Hubbard / Erika Roman vs Mary Hannah Robinson / Samantha Czarnecki0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Hannah Witt vs Jamie Hoffman / Lindsey Bax2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Thomas / Hannah Carroll vs Molly McCrory / Mary Swinney4-6, 3-6
2025-08-11vs McCroryLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Short / Hannah Carroll vs Samantha Czarnecki / Mary Hannah Robinson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMelanie Casillas / Hannah Witt vs Ashley Fiore / Molly McCrory0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Massey / Macklyn Hubbard vs Jamie Hoffman / Cindy Luna3-6, 0-6
2025-08-05vs HU 8.5W 18 & Over (Presson)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaggie Brown / Jessica Jones vs Anna Weber / Dawson Fite5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMakinly Baird / Hannah Witt vs Ginny Pylant / Morgan Coulter0-6, 0-6
2025-08-02vs McCroryLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaggie Brown / Melanie Casillas vs Emily Smith / Samantha Czarnecki1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Short / Jennifer Jaeger vs Mary Hannah Robinson / Ashley Fiore1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.14
Melanie Casillas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Susan Short
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.76
Hannah Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.73
Jennifer Jaeger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Makinly Baird
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.61
Maggie Brown
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Erika Roman
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Kasi Duckett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Macklyn Hubbard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lina Leahy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Massey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Macklyn Hubbard + Erika Roman2339% gamesnot enough data
Maggie Brown + Melanie Casillas123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Jaeger + Susan Short123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melanie Casillas
42W–37L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Susan Short
43W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.92
Hannah Carroll
28W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Jennifer Jaeger
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Makinly Baird
11W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Maggie Brown
56W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Erika Roman
10W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Kasi Duckett
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
3.58
Macklyn Hubbard
11W–10L career · 6 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
Lina Leahy
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Mary Massey
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.