Teams

Toubassi/Wolf

2025 KS 40 & Over Mixed Outdoor League · 8.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-19vs KS/Hardman/40&Over8.0MXDLost 12
L#1 DoublesNeal Crowell / Kristen Wolf vs Pravin Kulkarni / Amy Mathew4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Kautz / Maggie Seitz vs Dylan Jones / Laurie Newton6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJulie Kice / Jade Smith vs Chad Unrein / Shelly Hardman6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2025-08-13vs KS/Hardman/40&Over8.0MXDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRon Cox / Tahnee Maples vs Kelsey Baker / Chad Unrein4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Kice / Daniel Kautz vs Shelly Hardman / Pravin Kulkarni6-4, 6-3
2025-08-05vs KS/Hardman/40&Over8.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRon Cox / Olivia Cartwright vs Chris Heck / Laurie Newton4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNeal Crowell / Karen Strecker vs Chad Unrein / Kelsey Baker3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJade Smith / Tahnee Maples vs Dylan Jones / Shelly Hardman6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-07-30vs KS/Hardman/40&Over8.0MXDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNeal Crowell / Karen Strecker vs Shelly Hardman / Dylan Jones3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJoe Jittawait / Maggie Seitz vs Amy Mathew / Vladimir Solovey6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-07-22vs KS/Hardman/40&Over8.0MXDLost 03
L#1 DoublesRon Cox / Julie Kice vs Chris Heck / Laurie Newton2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNeal Crowell / Lesli WongToubassi vs Vladimir Solovey / Amy Mathew3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesSteve King / Tahnee Maples vs Dylan Jones / Kelsey Baker4-6, 3-6
2025-07-17vs KS/Hardman/40&Over8.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesLesli WongToubassi / Jade Smith vs Chris Heck / Laurie Newton2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Wolf / Steve King vs Shelly Hardman / Dylan Jones3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Karen Strecker
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Maggie Seitz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Jade Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.56
Joe Jittawait
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.54
Neal Crowell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Olivia Cartwright
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Tahnee Maples
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.45
Julie Kice
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.40
Steve King
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.39
Daniel Kautz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Lesli WongToubassi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kristen Wolf
published
Ron Cox
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neal Crowell + Karen Strecker13461% games+0.8% vs expected
Kristen Wolf + Joe Jittawait2352% gamesnot enough data
Tahnee Maples + Jade Smith2349% gamesnot enough data
Olivia Cartwright + Joe Jittawait224 matchesnot enough data
Ron Cox + Tahnee Maples033 matchesnot enough data
Lesli WongToubassi + Joe Jittawait033 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Kautz + Olivia Cartwright033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Strecker
96W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.71
Maggie Seitz
85W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Jade Smith
61W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.58
Joe Jittawait
60W–58L career · 1 line in 2025
34%65%<1%
3.56
Neal Crowell
83W–90L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
Olivia Cartwright
36W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Tahnee Maples
44W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Julie Kice
36W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
Steve King
44W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.40
4
Daniel Kautz
23W–49L career · 2 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Lesli WongToubassi
38W–80L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Kristen Wolf
66W–59L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ron Cox
59W–105L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.