Teams

Volley Vixens

2025 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 2.83 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-30vs AK-KaltenbachLost 01
L#1 DoublesBlair Robinson / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank vs Lori Kaltenbach / Conita Mullett3-6, 1-6
2025-07-28vs AK-KaltenbachLost 01
L#1 DoublesKai Sims / Sandra Mullen vs Lori Kaltenbach / Conita Mullett3-6, 1-6
2025-07-15vs Doubles DoctorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Mullen / Kai Sims vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian / Lauren Divine5-7, 6-7
2025-07-09vs Valley GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesKai Sims / Sandra Mullen vs Michelle Dietz / Susan Brunner6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-02vs Doubles DoctorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKai Sims / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank vs Julie Raymond-Yakoubian / Lauren Divine2-6, 0-6
2025-06-28vs Slamm’n CC’sLost 01
L#1 DoublesBlair Robinson / Lesleigh Kowalski Frank vs Cecilia Hopper / Cynthia Henie2-6, 0-6
2025-06-25vs Slamm’n CC’sLost 01
L#1 DoublesKai Sims / Sandra Mullen vs Cecilia Hopper / Cynthia Henie3-6, 0-6
2025-06-11vs Alley CatsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Mullen / Blair Robinson vs Eleanor Morse / Xochitl Foster6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-06-10vs Alley CatsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Mullen / Blair Robinson vs Xochitl Foster / Eleanor Morse0-6, 4-6
2025-06-03vs Valley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKai Sims / Sandra Mullen vs Christie Wyzykowski / Susan Brunner6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AK-Kaltenbach9191573
2Slamm’n CC’s7373761
3Doubles Doctors7373893
4Valley Girls282817110
5Volley Vixens191919118

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Kai Sims
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Sandra Mullen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Blair Robinson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Lesleigh Kowalski Frank
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandra Mullen + Kai Sims1539% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Mullen + Blair Robinson123 matchesnot enough data
Blair Robinson + Kai Sims123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Kai Sims
13W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Sandra Mullen
11W–28L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
2.5
Blair Robinson
16W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
Lesleigh Kowalski Frank
3W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.