Teams

LOTA/Elizabeth Corbett

2026 LOTA USTA Adult 55 & Over Women - Spring · Women 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-23vs LOTA/Jane MelilliWon 21
W#1 DoublesTeri Greenberg / Jennifer Garrison vs Jeanne Mosakowski / Geri Pomerantz6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Carapezzi / Donyalle Thomas vs Catherine Forscht / Susan Mason6-0, 7-5
L#3 DoublesTammy Rastello / Michelle Volgenau vs Tina Burns / Diane Brahn3-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs LOTA/Jane MelilliLost 12
W#1 DoublesLaura Carapezzi / Donyalle Thomas vs Diane Brahn / Tina Burns7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBursley Hoefer / Marren Kara vs Kimberly Smith / Jeannine Flynn6-7, 1-5
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Corbett / Michele Sarkisian vs Susan Mason / Jane Melilli2-6, 1-6
2026-04-02vs LOTA/Jane MelilliWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Niemann / Jennie MacKechnie vs Jeannine Flynn / Kimberly Smith6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLaura Carapezzi / Jennifer Garrison vs Kathryn Hein / Cheryl Mazza6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Corbett / Lin O'Leary vs Susan Mason / Jane Melilli5-7, 4-6
2026-03-26vs LOTA/Jane MelilliLost 12
W#1 DoublesBursley Hoefer / Jennifer Niemann vs Kimberly Smith / Gail Watkins6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLaura Carapezzi / Elizabeth Corbett vs Jeannine Flynn / Kathryn Hein4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTammy Rastello / Michele Sarkisian vs Tina Burns / Diane Brahn2-6, 1-6
2026-03-19vs LOTA/Jane MelilliLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonyalle Thomas / Elizabeth Pearson vs Catherine Forscht / Kimberly Smith0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Garrison / Marren Kara vs Cheryl Mazza / Diane Brahn7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSally Beach / Michelle Volgenau vs Susan Mason / Jane Melilli1-6, 3-6
2026-03-12vs LOTA/Jane MelilliLost 12
W#1 DoublesBursley Hoefer / Jennifer Niemann vs Gail Watkins / Jeanne Mosakowski7-6, 7-5
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Pearson / Laura Carapezzi vs Geri Pomerantz / Kathryn Hein7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Corbett / Michele Sarkisian vs Catherine Forscht / Jeannine Flynn7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LOTA/Jane Melilli4211718157
2LOTA/Elizabeth Corbett2471123178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Bursley Hoefer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.43
Jennifer Niemann
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Laura Carapezzi
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.23
Jennie MacKechnie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Teri Greenberg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.20
Donyalle Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.16
Jennifer Garrison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Marren Kara
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Elizabeth Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Michele Sarkisian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Michelle Volgenau
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Elizabeth Corbett
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.51
Tammy Rastello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lin O'Leary
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sally Beach
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Niemann + Bursley Hoefer8166% games+9.7% vs expected
Jennifer Garrison + Marren Kara7160% games+2.0% vs expected
Marren Kara + Bursley Hoefer314 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Garrison + Laura Carapezzi303 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Garrison + Teri Greenberg303 matchesnot enough data
Jennie MacKechnie + Jennifer Niemann303 matchesnot enough data
Donyalle Thomas + Laura Carapezzi303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bursley Hoefer
28W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
Jennifer Niemann
11W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.43
Laura Carapezzi
7W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Jennie MacKechnie
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
Teri Greenberg
5W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Donyalle Thomas
29W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
Jennifer Garrison
26W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.16
Marren Kara
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Elizabeth Pearson
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.14
Michele Sarkisian
13W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
Michelle Volgenau
4W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Elizabeth Corbett
28W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.67
Tammy Rastello
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
2.51
Lin O'Leary
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Sally Beach
11W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.