Teams

Edwards, Alice

2021 Adult 40 & Over 3.0 - 4.5 - Weekend · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.88 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-03-28vs Nelson, CydneyWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlice Edwards / Amanda Miller vs Jennifer Shore / Kristi LaMothe7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMarly McMillen / Natalie Hartman vs Ann McLiney / Brenda Moore6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeely Schneider / Marti Huffman vs Kathy Hawley / Bridget Smithmier6-3, 7-6
2021-03-21vs Thompson, LauraWon 40
W#1 DoublesHeidi Hoggatt / Carrie Cooper vs Rebecca Kowalczyk / Maureen Lobdell5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDina Mitchell vs Sarah Andrews6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlice Edwards / Amanda Miller vs Jane True / Robin Ayers6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKristin Heurtin / Stacie Temple vs Laura Thompson / Jane Slavik6-3, 6-1
2021-03-14vs Sanders, KimberlyWon 31
W#1 DoublesSusan McConkey / Marly McMillen vs Kim McRae / Kimberly Sanders6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDina Mitchell vs Brenda Foree6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarti Huffman / Keely Schneider vs Deborah Wagner / Amy Fisch6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichele McIntosh / Melanie Goodlow-Vinduska vs Julie Drake / Megan Baker6-7, 3-2, 0-1
2021-03-07vs Bennett, ConnieWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlice Edwards / Amanda Miller vs Candace Herman / Niorn Nicholas7-5, 3-2
W#1 SinglesDina Mitchell vs Natalie Neal6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHeidi Hoggatt / Carrie Cooper vs Ronda Harness / Carol Schmer6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKristin Heurtin / Stacie Temple vs Tricia Boushka / Maureen Goetz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-02-28vs Kochersperger, CindyWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan McConkey / Dina Mitchell vs Cindy Kochersperger / Alysen Abel6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMarti Huffman / Natalie Hartman vs Kris Gronau / Barb Ginavan6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichele McIntosh / Melanie Goodlow-Vinduska vs Jeannette Baumler / Lynn Looloian6-4, 4-4
2021-02-21vs Wood, BarbaraWon 40
W#1 DoublesAlice Edwards / Kristin Heurtin vs Barbara Wood / Natalie Atwater6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesStacie Temple vs Lori Blinn6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan McConkey / Natalie Hartman vs Veronica Wolff / Patty Jensen7-6, 3-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeely Schneider / Marti Huffman vs Julie Fuller / Ann Cronkhite6-1, 6-0
2021-02-20vs Krishna, AngelWon 40
W#1 DoublesAmanda Miller / Carrie Cooper vs Melinda McCalla / Theresa Danforth Costello6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDina Mitchell vs Ruth Ospino6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlice Edwards / Kristin Heurtin vs Judy Yi / Courtney Root6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStacie Temple / Heidi Hoggatt vs Angel Krishna / Julie Gibson6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dina Mitchell
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
Carrie Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.68
Marly McMillen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Kristin Heurtin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.32
Susan McConkey
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.31
Heidi Hoggatt
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Alice Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.17
Natalie Hartman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Melanie Goodlow-Vinduska
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Keely Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marti Huffman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michele McIntosh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Stacie Temple
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan McConkey + Marly McMillen18363% games+7.0% vs expected
Susan McConkey + Marti Huffman10164% games+5.2% vs expected
Carrie Cooper + Heidi Hoggatt16460% games+4.4% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Stacie Temple15956% games+2.9% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Alice Edwards19756% games+2.8% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Heidi Hoggatt251655% games+1.8% vs expected
Susan McConkey + Alice Edwards261753% games+1.1% vs expected
Kristin Heurtin + Marly McMillen171255% games+0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dina Mitchell
174W–84L career · 5 lines in 2021
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Carrie Cooper
62W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marly McMillen
115W–78L career · 2 lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
Kristin Heurtin
170W–166L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.46
Susan McConkey
110W–69L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Heidi Hoggatt
90W–71L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Alice Edwards
179W–122L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Natalie Hartman
86W–70L career · 3 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
Melanie Goodlow-Vinduska
32W–41L career · 2 lines in 2021
53%47%<1%
2.99
Keely Schneider
53W–46L career · 3 lines in 2021
58%42%<1%
2.97
Marti Huffman
58W–33L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele McIntosh
18W–27L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Stacie Temple
80W–55L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.