Teams

BASTA

2026 South East Tennis Singles 40 & Over League · 4.0 Men 40 & Over

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-02-19vs LOZITO 40 SinglesLost 02
L#2 SinglesHuntley Garriott vs Johannes Haasbroek6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBruce Mason vs Adam Pflaumer0-1
2026-02-19vs McCabe 40 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Janik vs Bryan McCabe6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesChris Hoenig vs Dennis Werner6-4, 0-6, 1-0
2026-02-16vs LOZITO 40 SinglesWon 10
W#2 SinglesNick Basta vs Adam Pflaumer6-4, 6-4
2026-02-15vs Lautenbach CCLSplit 11
W#1 SinglesMatthew Janik vs Alan Oester6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesNick Basta vs Chris Whitney3-6, 4-6
2026-02-09vs LOZITO 40 SinglesSplit 11
L#1 SinglesNick Basta vs Jason Weddle1-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesWalker Abney vs Adam Pflaumer6-2, 6-2
2026-02-05vs McCabe 40 SinglesLost 02
L#1 SinglesMatthew Janik vs Jason Ingraham4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 SinglesChris Hoenig vs Ben Whitlock3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-01-29vs Lautenbach CCLLost 01
L#3 SinglesNick Basta vs Marc Ross1-6, 1-6
2026-01-20vs McCabe 40 SinglesLost 03
L#1 SinglesMatthew Janik vs Charlie Lamb6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNick Basta vs Dereck Boone2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesWalker Abney vs Christopher Soule1-6, 1-6
2026-01-15vs Lautenbach CCLLost 02
L#1 SinglesChris Hoenig vs Matej Polomsky4-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesBruce Mason vs Marc Ross1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.0 Men 40 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LOZITO 40 Singles54141331247
2McCabe 40 Singles45151231237
3BASTA2781939252

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Matthew Janik
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.70
Huntley Garriott
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.67
Chris Hoenig
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.35
Nick Basta
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.33
Walker Abney
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Bruce Mason
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Janik + Nick Basta213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Janik
18W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Huntley Garriott
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Chris Hoenig
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.67
Nick Basta
32W–50L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
Walker Abney
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Bruce Mason
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
3.13

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.