Teams

Corthum/Forest Oaks 40s 8.5 M Tues PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 40 & Over · 8.5 Men 40+ Tues PM

13 players · average NTRP 4.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-17vs Rosario 40s 8.5 Combo M Tues PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesBrian Johnson / Chris McCandless vs Bryan Vescio / Amiel Rossabi4-6, 3-6
2024-08-27vs Rosario 40s 8.5 Combo M Tues PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesRoddy Akbari / Brian Johnson vs Michael Davis / Philip Weikel4-6, 2-6
2024-08-13vs Webster 40s 8.5 Combo M Tues PMWon 10
W#3 DoublesCharley Eberhard / Brian Johnson vs Stephen Parsons / Peter Glud7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Men 40+ Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Chuck Burns
published 4.5
4.19
Lee Picklesimer
published
4.18
Jay Hitchcock
published
4.06
Brian Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.03
Jason Altmann
published
3.98
Charley Eberhard
published 4
3.92
Peter Novosad
published
3.84
3.67
Chris McCandless
published 4
3.65
Roddy Akbari
published
3.59
Jeffrey Albright
published
Matthew Barbee
published
Michael Corthum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peter Novosad + Jay Hitchcock5068% gamesnot enough data
Jeffrey Albright + Jason Altmann314 matchesnot enough data
Jay Hitchcock + Christopher Bryce213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chuck Burns
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
4.26
Lee Picklesimer
20W–7L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
Jay Hitchcock
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Brian Johnson
127W–77L career · 3 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
Jason Altmann
27W–10L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Charley Eberhard
11W–7L career · type A · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
3.98
Peter Novosad
39W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
Christopher Bryce
19W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Chris McCandless
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.67
Roddy Akbari
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
3.65
Jeffrey Albright
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Matthew Barbee
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Corthum
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.