Teams

3-RGoff-Eno

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-21vs 4-AYoung-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichael Pournaras vs Ryan Curet6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJohn Nealis / Lance Long vs Ethan Holston / XINGZHOU LI6-1, 6-3
2022-04-07vs 2-TKharva-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichael Pournaras vs Vijaya Sarathy Berkai Srinivasan6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLance Long / Taylor VICK vs James Schap / Mark Scherr6-0, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAlphonso Donaldson / Michael Pournaras vs James White / Thomas McDonnell4-6, 2-6
2022-03-26vs 7-DWork-SVSplit 11
W#2 SinglesMichael Pournaras vs Duncan Work6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesThomas Steet / Lance Long vs David Hubacher / Jo Eidsvik1-6, 1-6
2022-03-15vs 8-CHamilton-HVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesMichael Pournaras vs Sean Selig6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTaylor VICK / Lance Long vs William Lucas / Chris Hamilton6-0, 6-2
2022-03-01vs 6-DBlackwell-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Gordon / Michael Pournaras vs Dexter Blackwell / Eric Langhans6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLance Long / Maxwell Gregson vs Mark Spining / Dustin Marquise6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men-Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Maxwell Gregson
published
3.64
John Nealis
published
3.61
David Huie
published 4
3.53
Charles Gordon
published 3.5
3.46
Michael Pournaras
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.44
Ryan Goff
published
3.32
Taylor VICK
published
3.27
Lance Long
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Ralph Gildehaus
published
3.10
Thomas Steet
published
2.97
Scott Daniel
published
2.95
Nicholas Broccolo
published
Alphonso Donaldson
published
Justin Bryant
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ryan Goff + Charles Gordon2743% games−5.7% vs expected
John Nealis + Taylor VICK033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maxwell Gregson
25W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
3.93
John Nealis
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
David Huie
2W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Charles Gordon
19W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.53
4
Michael Pournaras
83W–70L career · 6 lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
3.46
Ryan Goff
14W–19L career · no lines in 2022
<1%68%32%
3.44
Taylor VICK
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Lance Long
72W–67L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Ralph Gildehaus
16W–18L career · no lines in 2022
8%92%1%
3.19
Thomas Steet
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
3.10
Scott Daniel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Nicholas Broccolo
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
Alphonso Donaldson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Justin Bryant
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.