Teams

Terminetters

2024 Tri-One Doubles League · 4.0 Women

5 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2024-09-29vs Shot GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Stacey Merrick vs Cheryl Yoshida / Chanel Hebaru6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2024-09-22vs Tri oomphWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacey Merrick / Brooke Heiken vs Jessica Nishikawa / Alexis Steele6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-09-08vs The In CrowdWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Sydney Hall vs Lauren Eudoxie / Jocelyn Kuniyoshi6-3, 6-1
2024-09-07vs ALOHA DOUBLESLost 01
L#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Brooke Heiken vs Miyuki Haught / Kaori Teixeira3-6, 2-6
2024-09-01vs OCeans TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Brooke Heiken vs Anna Womack / Hideko Kishi7-5, 6-3
2024-08-31vs Shot GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Brooke Heiken vs Cheryl Yoshida / Tamlyn Takeno7-6, 7-5
2024-08-18vs Tri oomphLost 01
L#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Sydney Hall vs Alexis Steele / Jessica Nishikawa4-6, 6-7
2024-08-11vs Ruru Tri 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBrooke Heiken / Stacey Merrick vs Leah Yamamoto / Hanha Youn5-7, 3-6
2024-08-04vs The In CrowdWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Brooke Heiken vs Amber Stanley / Lauren Eudoxie6-0, 6-1
2024-07-28vs ALOHA DOUBLESWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Stacey Merrick vs Miyuki Haught / Kaori Teixeira6-4, 6-3
2024-07-27vs OCeans TriWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaina Hall / Brooke Heiken vs Kathleen Connolly / Kaneko Bell6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.11
Brooke Heiken
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Stacey Merrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.73
Noriko Tamamoto
published 4
Elaina Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sydney Hall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Noriko Tamamoto + Brooke Heiken8074% games+9.1% vs expected
Brooke Heiken + Elaina Hall5161% games+1.9% vs expected
Sydney Hall + Elaina Hall6256% games+1.6% vs expected
Stacey Merrick + Brooke Heiken5354% games−1.0% vs expected
Noriko Tamamoto + Elaina Hall224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Brooke Heiken
170W–83L career · 7 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Stacey Merrick
117W–64L career · 7 lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
4.09
4
Noriko Tamamoto
89W–59L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Elaina Hall
42W–39L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sydney Hall
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.