Teams

TeamForman (Riviera Tennis Center)

2022 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.71 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Maira Maguire
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
3.81
Judy Prado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Maricarmen Diazmiron
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Karen Fishman
published
3.57
Mellissa Cili
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.49
Monica Pardo
published
3.44
Lorena Guadiana
published
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.38
Kelly James
published
3.36
Luisa Angel
published
3.29
XIMENA OTERO
published
3.25
3.18
Tania Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Ana Veloso
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Gina Marinelli
published 3.5
3.04
ANGELA MUSSO
published 3.5
Jane Forman
published
Tracie Williams
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie Williams + Mellissa Cili19659% games+3.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco + Leticia Diaz6556% games+1.0% vs expected
Tania Rodriguez + Maricarmen Diazmiron281259% games−9.4% vs expected
Mellissa Cili + Judy Prado8258% gamesnot enough data
Mellissa Cili + Maira Maguire6361% gamesnot enough data
Maricarmen Diazmiron + Judy Prado1637% gamesnot enough data
Judy Prado + Maira Maguire4359% gamesnot enough data
Maricarmen Diazmiron + Mellissa Cili134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maira Maguire
129W–107L career · 9 lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
3.96
4
Judy Prado
208W–126L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Maricarmen Diazmiron
249W–150L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Karen Fishman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
28%71%<1%
3.57
3.5
Mellissa Cili
229W–184L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
Monica Pardo
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
Lorena Guadiana
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.44
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
Kelly James
19W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.38
Luisa Angel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
XIMENA OTERO
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Elizabeth Ruiz Velasco
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.25
Tania Rodriguez
93W–41L career · 2 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Ana Veloso
54W–94L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Gina Marinelli
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
ANGELA MUSSO
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tracie Williams
196W–131L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.