Teams

Nyholm - Team Love All

2025 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 4.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.86 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-01vs Hobbs AndersonWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Sarah Curfman vs Jennifer Frascone / Dina Wolkoff6-4, 6-2
2025-06-24vs ALLEX 4.0 Summer 18+Split 11
L#1 SinglesWhitney Nyholm vs Marie Labenski6-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEmily Arndt / Sarah Curfman vs Jennie Ollila / Kerry Norgaard6-4, 6-2
2025-06-17vs Northern/Reiling/18&Over4.0WSplit 11
W#1 SinglesWhitney Nyholm vs Megan Bradley4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAngel Nasrabadi / Emily Arndt vs Patty Barr / Kara Pederson2-6, 2-6
2025-06-14Won 20
W#1 DoublesWhitney Nyholm / Rachel Henning vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesEmily Arndt vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-06-10vs Ouyang/Pjevach 18+ S2025Won 10
W#2 DoublesWhitney Nyholm / Lina Wang vs Angela Fischels / Amy Sorrels7-6, 7-6
2025-05-27vs BaerenwaldTownsendSummer25Split 11
W#1 DoublesWhitney Nyholm / Lina Wang vs Rachel Reese / Alyssa Vanderschaaf4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesEmily Arndt vs Olga Karpov1-6, 3-6
2025-05-20vs Wolson/Abbott 18+4.0 SummerWon 10
W#1 DoublesRachel Henning / Whitney Nyholm vs Danielle Schwier / Elizabeth Kruse7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-13vs Gould/Kuberski Summer 18sSplit 11
W#2 DoublesWhitney Nyholm / Lindsey Schumer vs Zeny McCoy / Vanessa Sexton7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesEmily Arndt vs Jennifer Johnson3-6, 6-7
2025-05-06vs Ouyang/Pjevach 18+ S2025Lost 14
L#1 DoublesRachel Dietrich / Lindsey Schumer vs Stacy Katsiyiannis / Megan Wrobel3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAmy Stern vs Marcela Palavecino6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRachel Henning / Erin Blacik vs Amy Sorrels / Carol Steiger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesIrina Hogetvedt vs Michelle Finlon3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLina Wang / Jessica Yineman vs Angela Fischels / Stacey Douville6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.60 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Amy Stern
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.83
Rachel Henning
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Whitney Nyholm
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4
3.75
Rachel Dietrich
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Laura Huck
published
3.62
Erin Blacik
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Lauren Bralski
published
3.62
Lina Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
Alla Epshteyn
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.60
Katie Day
published
3.56
Angel Nasrabadi
published 4
3.53
Sydney Davis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.47
Sarah Curfman
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.44
Emily Arndt
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.42
Jessica Yineman
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.31
Irina Hogetvedt
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Lindsey Schumer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Blacik + Angel Nasrabadi6352% games+13.0% vs expected
Amy Stern + Katie Day6353% games−0.1% vs expected
Lina Wang + Erin Blacik4153% gamesnot enough data
Jessica Yineman + Rachel Dietrich224 matchesnot enough data
Lina Wang + Emily Arndt123 matchesnot enough data
Lina Wang + Laura Huck033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Stern
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%87%12%
3.85
Rachel Henning
20W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Whitney Nyholm
41W–25L career · 11 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
Rachel Dietrich
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Laura Huck
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Erin Blacik
19W–31L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.62
Lauren Bralski
19W–27L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lina Wang
18W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
4
Alla Epshteyn
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Katie Day
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Angel Nasrabadi
37W–28L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.56
Sydney Davis
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
Sarah Curfman
58W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.47
3.5
Emily Arndt
112W–89L career · 14 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Jessica Yineman
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Irina Hogetvedt
6W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Lindsey Schumer
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.