Teams

RTC MYERS

2024 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Men · Saturday 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-05-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesChris White / Chris Nguyen vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-05-11vs MCL RIVERALost 01
L#2 DoublesMichael Lewis / Chris White vs Dan Do / Jomar Candelaria3-6, 3-6
2024-03-30vs BIR CHRISTIANSENWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris White / Vikram Balasubramanian vs Shiraz Rehman / John Stewart6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2024-03-23vs LHS ANDERSWon 10
W#2 DoublesChris White / Matt Lindsey vs Bill Stetzer / Victor Nguyen6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Jeff Fikar
published
3.93
Matt Lindsey
published
3.87
Edgar Martinez
published 4
3.77
Dusty Dendy
published 4
3.76
Brandon Sheppard
published 4
Chris White
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.68
Andrew Thompson
published 4
3.62
Ray Harris
published
3.56
Kapil Lahoti
published
Brian Burson
published
Kumar Ramachandran
published
Michael Lewis
published
William Ambrose
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vikram Balasubramanian + Srinivasan Subramanian1444% gamesnot enough data
Ray Harris + Dusty Dendy314 matchesnot enough data
Ray Harris + Kapil Lahoti224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeff Fikar
12W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.96
Matt Lindsey
6W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Edgar Martinez
16W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Dusty Dendy
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Vikram Balasubramanian
18W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Brandon Sheppard
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Chris White
26W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Andrew Thompson
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Ray Harris
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.62
Kapil Lahoti
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
Brian Burson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kumar Ramachandran
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Lewis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Srinivasan Subramanian
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
William Ambrose
19W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.