Teams

KY/LEX/McCubbin

2025 USTA LEAGUE 18 & Over ADULT LEXINGTON · Men 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.93 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Takuma Mitsuhashi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.09
Avery Warf
usually #2 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.08
Chris Cassagne
published 4
4.07
William McCubbin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Benson Good
published 4
3.96
William Stevens
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.93
Ched Crouse
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Singles 18% · published 4
3.93
Jonathan Peters
published
3.92
Tony Khan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.90
Clinton Colliver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Leony Barroso
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.88
Sameer Desai
published
3.74
Jonathan Gough
published
3.67
Orleigh Suazo
published
3.54
Dan Hollingshead
published 4
3.28
Casey Hutchens
published 3.5
Jacob Freeland
published
Luke Earlywine
published
Scott Geiser
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ched Crouse + Tony Khan5157% gamesnot enough data
Ched Crouse + William McCubbin5070% gamesnot enough data
Casey Hutchens + William McCubbin213 matchesnot enough data
Avery Warf + William McCubbin303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Takuma Mitsuhashi
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
4.53
4
Avery Warf
11W–4L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
4.09
4
Chris Cassagne
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%28%72%
4.08
William McCubbin
48W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Benson Good
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.98
William Stevens
8W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Ched Crouse
131W–30L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.93
Jonathan Peters
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.93
Tony Khan
11W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Clinton Colliver
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.90
Leony Barroso
21W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
Sameer Desai
11W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.88
Jonathan Gough
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.74
Orleigh Suazo
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Dan Hollingshead
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
3.5
Casey Hutchens
28W–13L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Jacob Freeland
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Luke Earlywine
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Geiser
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.