Teams

Sitton - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-18vs Gonterman - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Richardson / George Rials vs John Whittenberger / Todd Fisher6-1, 6-0
2024-06-04vs Escambia/Fabbro/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Richardson / George Rials vs Robert Fabbro / Craig Abel3-6, 2-6
2024-05-28vs Gonterman - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Richardson / George Rials vs John Whittenberger / Todd Fisher6-4, 6-2
2024-05-21vs O'Neill - PCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesJames Richardson / George Rials vs Steven Bingert / Glenn Langan6-2, 6-1
2024-05-14vs Escambia/Fabbro/18&Over3.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosh Sitton / George Rials vs Christopher Zuber / Robert Fabbro4-6, 4-6
2024-04-23vs Escambia/Fabbro/18&Over3.5MWon 10
W#1 DoublesTyler Gross / George Rials vs Scott Aspinwall / Robert Fabbro4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Josh Sitton
published
3.67
Alex Leonard
published 4
3.53
Nick Farkas
published
3.50
George Rials
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.50
Brian Waghalter
published 3.5
3.41
JOHNNY DICKSON
published
3.40
Gregory Gill
published
3.37
Rhett Gross
published
3.17
Joe Nunnari
published
3.17
Scott Antonio
published
3.11
Mark Brabham
published
James Richardson
published
Tyler Gross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Scott Antonio + Rhett Gross213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Josh Sitton
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.96
4
Alex Leonard
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Nick Farkas
47W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
George Rials
95W–44L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Brian Waghalter
5W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
JOHNNY DICKSON
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%26%
3.41
Gregory Gill
13W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.40
Rhett Gross
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Joe Nunnari
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Scott Antonio
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Mark Brabham
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
3.11
James Richardson
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tyler Gross
10W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.