Teams

9 Rockwood Cove Ladies - Moore

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesMargaret Moore vs Erin Nord6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJoslyn Wolberg vs Lindsay Wiggins6-7, 3-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Ashton vs Blair Belote0-6, 1-6
2025-10-27vs 17 MTC 2.5 Singles - ChenevertLost 03
L#1 SinglesMargaret Moore vs Nikki Schurman3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesGuo Yu vs Candice Duncan1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Ashton vs Brittney Hackworth2-6, 4-6
2025-10-20vs 12 Willow Oaks 2.5 KaysLost 03
L#1 SinglesJoslyn Wolberg vs Ann Kuhn0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Cross vs Kendall Maximini3-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesEmily Ashton vs Rosemary Begin1-6, 4-6
2025-10-13vs 10 ACAC - AdkinsLost 03
L#1 SinglesGuo Yu vs Marydith Newman1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJaime Budny vs Anna Holloway0-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesAmy Cross vs Margaret Phipps2-6, 0-6
2025-10-06vs 16 Avalon HallettLost 12
L#1 SinglesJaime Budny vs Martha Luchsinger2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Cross vs Jana Braswell4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesGuo Yu vs Madelaine Jones6-1, 6-3
2025-09-29vs 14 Chestnut Oaks WistLost 03
L#1 SinglesJoslyn Wolberg vs Sara Wist4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMargaret Moore vs Meghan Gemmill2-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesGuo Yu vs Anita Leuschen1-6, 0-6
2025-09-22vs 7 SCC Happy Hitters - PercyLost 03
L#1 SinglesJoslyn Wolberg vs Michelle Foley2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAmy Cross vs Leslie Percy4-6, 5-7
L#3 SinglesEmily Ashton vs Kristen Hensel0-6, 0-6
2025-09-15vs 1 HCC GarnerLost 03
L#1 SinglesMargaret Moore vs Kathryn Horsley0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJaime Budny vs Kimberly Rudolph1-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesAmy Cross vs Corrine Garner2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.13 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.53
Margaret Moore
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.34
Joslyn Wolberg
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.12
Amy Cross
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 2.5
1.95
Guo Yu
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.94
Jaime Budny
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.91
Emily Ashton
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Cross + Emily Ashton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Moore
12W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Joslyn Wolberg
4W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
2.5
Amy Cross
3W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Guo Yu
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Jaime Budny
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
Emily Ashton
1W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.91

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.