Teams

KAllen (Raintree)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-25vs DdeArmas (Firethorne)Won 20
W#1 DoublesBonnie Sheppard / Staci Wittek vs Patty Swan / Julianne Gray6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLesley Quick vs Joanne Hurley6-1, 6-0
2022-04-18vs THyso/Smith (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Bonnie Sheppard vs Stacey Whitney / Maureen Smith6-2, 6-2
2022-04-11vs TBlankenship (PCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesStaci Wittek / Rachel Hallsten vs Janet Gilliam / Sharon Dolan4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAlyson Sunden / Renee Ziemianski vs Monica Smith / Ashley Sofsian6-3, 6-1
2022-04-04vs MMetz/SAsby (Sardis)Won 10
W#2 DoublesRachel Hallsten / Alyson Sunden vs Anne Whalan / Kiera Young7-6, 6-4
2022-03-28vs CMiles (Queens)Won 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Ziemianski / Alyson Sunden vs Barbara Clement / Margie Pollard6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLaura Sullivan / Staci Wittek vs Vlasta Vulovic / Qing Yang6-3, 6-0
2022-03-07vs DMusante (Matthews)Split 11
W#2 DoublesAlyson Sunden / Lesley Quick vs Lisa Pacello / Debbie Barnes6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStaci Wittek / Erin Moser vs Maryann Parfitt / Julie Linder6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-02-28vs DdeArmas (Firethorne)Won 10
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Rachel Hallsten vs Julianne Gray / Danielle Shealy6-1, 7-5
2022-02-21vs THyso/Smith (Life Time)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLesley Quick / Alyson Sunden vs Trisha Hyso / Stacey Whitney6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesStaci Wittek / Erin Moser vs Maureen Smith / Karen Moran6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Bonnie Sheppard
published 3.5
3.37
Lesley Quick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Alyson Sunden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.25
Renee Ziemianski
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Erin Moser
published 3.5
3.15
Staci Wittek
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.13
Hilda Austin
published 3.5
3.03
Susan Chandler
published
2.82
Denise Dexter
published 3
2.75
Nicole Love
published
Rachel Hallsten
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lesley Quick + Alyson Sunden5357% games+8.2% vs expected
Staci Wittek + Alyson Sunden3450% gamesnot enough data
Renee Ziemianski + Alyson Sunden213 matchesnot enough data
Staci Wittek + Denise Dexter303 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Quick + Susan Chandler213 matchesnot enough data
Alyson Sunden + Susan Chandler303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bonnie Sheppard
9W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Lesley Quick
83W–46L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%83%17%
3.37
3.5
Alyson Sunden
75W–60L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Renee Ziemianski
16W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Erin Moser
22W–16L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Staci Wittek
99W–96L career · 7 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
3.5
Hilda Austin
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Susan Chandler
35W–30L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.03
3
Denise Dexter
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
2.82
Nicole Love
29W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
2.75
Rachel Hallsten
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.