Teams

BBTL (C) 2.5W 55 & Over (Ryan)

55 & Over 2.5 Women · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-18vs LCTA (A) 2.5W 55 & Over (Carr)Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Ethier / Patricia Overly vs Cynthia Bing-Legare / Kimberly Morrow6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDawn Brooker / Emily Mahoney vs Tammy van Cleef / Mary Mitchell6-0, 6-4
L#1 DoublesJamie James / Jennifer Ethier vs Theresa Turano / Stacy Waller2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAlison Whitworth / Elizabeth Brisco vs Karen Goldenfield / Amy Schmit6-0, 6-1
2026-05-17vs UPTA (A) 2.5W 55 & Over (Kaurloto)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesAlison Whitworth / Elizabeth Brisco vs Cathy Nance / Suzanne Piechotta2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJamie James / Patricia Overly vs Julia Kreisher / Vicki Tougaw4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-05-16vs BBTL (A) 2.5W 55 & Over (Bongiorno)Split 11
W#2 DoublesDawn Brooker / Elizabeth Brisco vs Debbie Draper / Kathleen Fagan3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ethier / Patricia Overly vs Jennifer Woods / Kelly Collins3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1UPTA (A) 2.5W 55 & Over (Kaurloto)40102890
2BBTL (C) 2.5W 55 & Over (Ryan)31841080
3BBTL (A) 2.5W 55 & Over (Bongiorno)22751090
4LCTA (A) 2.5W 55 & Over (Carr)1321021131
5BBTL (B) 2.5W 55 & Over (Goldenfield)043919129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.47
Dawn Brooker
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.44
Alison Whitworth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.36
Jamie James
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.20
Jennifer Ethier
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.19
Emily Mahoney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Patricia Overly
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tracey Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dawn Brooker + Alison Whitworth5548% games+4.8% vs expected
Jamie James + Jennifer Ethier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Dawn Brooker
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Alison Whitworth
9W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%68%32%
2.44
2.5
Jamie James
5W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Jennifer Ethier
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
2.5
Emily Mahoney
8W–4L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Patricia Overly
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Tracey Ryan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.