Teams

Moore/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 4.0 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-11-23vs Bell/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesDarshan Sampat / Matt Moore vs BALAJI KRISHNAIAH / Jonathan Laman1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAdrian Agulto vs Neal Patel6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCaden LeBlanc / Matthew Keeler vs Jerry Vaughn / Alfredo Ale7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-10-27vs Gladstone/MemphisWon 31
W#1 DoublesMatthew Keeler / Caden LeBlanc vs Taylor Long / Ben Avant6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDarshan Sampat / Tripp Yates vs Ben Gladstone / Ben Ricketts6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJohn Matsek vs Andre George II1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKENTA SUZUKI / Daniel Murdoch vs Michael Bradshaw / Marc Mihalko6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Grant Goforth
published
3.97
Caden LeBlanc
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.91
Daniel Murdoch
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.85
Adrian Agulto
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.83
Will Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.82
Darshan Sampat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Matthew Keeler
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
3.70
Tripp Yates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
KENTA SUZUKI
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Griffin Lonardo
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.62
Luca Lemee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.58
John Matsek
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.47
Jeff Earnest
published
3.42
Cade Bishop
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Alex Wells
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Estefan Perez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cade Bishop + Caden LeBlanc8159% games+7.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grant Goforth
10W–0L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Caden LeBlanc
30W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.97
4
Daniel Murdoch
17W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
4
Adrian Agulto
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
3.85
Will Hudson
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Darshan Sampat
13W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Matthew Keeler
13W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Tripp Yates
2W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
KENTA SUZUKI
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Griffin Lonardo
17W–5L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.66
Luca Lemee
13W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.62
John Matsek
2W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.58
Jeff Earnest
2W–7L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Cade Bishop
26W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Alex Wells
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
Estefan Perez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.