Teams

The Players Club

2025 Winter A40&O · 2025 Winter A40&O 4.5 MEN Saturday

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · 2025 Winter A40&O 4.5 MEN Saturday
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1The Players Club4113715158
2Wickertree33101431230

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Tetsuro Togawa
published
4.33
Milan Pereira
published
4.32
Eric Chabot
published
4.28
R Pepino
published
4.26
Jamie Marksberry
published
4.25
Dale Wynkoop
published 4.5
Aaron Koch
published 4.5
Adam Ewing
published 4.5
Alexander Thompson
published 4.5
4.24
Mark Waterstreet
published
4.16
Walter Samora
published
4.15
J R Pepino
published
4.15
Patrick McColgan
published
4.10
James Hackett
published
4.03
Chris Wehler
published 4.5
3.98
Jarrett Skrobarcek
published
3.95
Johaun Cheng
published
3.95
Milan Jovanovic
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Byron Williams
published 4.5
Michael Herzog
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

J R Pepino + Tetsuro Togawa7158% games+7.6% vs expected
Chris Wehler + Dale Wynkoop5360% games+6.4% vs expected
Walter Samora + Jamie Marksberry502158% games+1.4% vs expected
J R Pepino + R Pepino3353% games+1.4% vs expected
Tetsuro Togawa + Milan Pereira11555% games+1.4% vs expected
Johaun Cheng + James Hackett6555% games+0.1% vs expected
Jarrett Skrobarcek + Dale Wynkoop61246% games−5.8% vs expected
Michael Herzog + Mark Waterstreet2342% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tetsuro Togawa
53W–23L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
4.39
Milan Pereira
53W–35L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
4.33
Eric Chabot
30W–33L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
R Pepino
32W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
4.28
Jamie Marksberry
97W–40L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
4.5
Dale Wynkoop
49W–42L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Aaron Koch
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Adam Ewing
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Alexander Thompson
24W–32L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Waterstreet
46W–34L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
4.24
Walter Samora
94W–42L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
4.16
J R Pepino
25W–54L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
Patrick McColgan
37W–30L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
James Hackett
81W–26L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Chris Wehler
29W–21L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Jarrett Skrobarcek
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Johaun Cheng
85W–58L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.95
Milan Jovanovic
144W–91L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.95
4.5
Byron Williams
10W–23L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.87
Michael Herzog
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.