Teams

Scarborough 3

2026 FALL A18&O WEEKEND · FALL 18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career

19 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for FALL 18&O 3.5 WOMEN Career have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Marilee Hanna
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.48
Reem Ghanem
published
3.38
Normalyn Emoff
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.38
Janet Conrad
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.35
Dainn Park
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.34
Heather Hunter
published
3.34
Mary Crall
published
3.33
Robin Larivey
published
3.26
Brandi Burch
published 3.5
Cassandra Stuber
published 3.5
3.23
Allison McGrath
published 3.5
3.22
Chelsea Dreven
published 3.5
3.16
Kate Jenks
published
3.12
Jackie Castleforte
published
3.07
Beth Gittins
published 3.5
3.03
Diana Obrokta
published 3
3.01
Tiina Kekalainen
published
2.92
Ashley Lundberg
published 3
2.65
Alison Parson
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marilee Hanna + Chelsea Dreven8071% games+14.6% vs expected
Ashley Lundberg + Jackie Castleforte7067% games+12.4% vs expected
Heather Hunter + Normalyn Emoff6060% games+12.1% vs expected
Reem Ghanem + Chelsea Dreven11461% games+11.9% vs expected
Reem Ghanem + Marilee Hanna18364% games+9.8% vs expected
Beth Gittins + Heather Hunter6458% games+9.3% vs expected
Heather Hunter + Marilee Hanna6359% games+7.3% vs expected
Reem Ghanem + Beth Gittins4455% games+5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marilee Hanna
256W–136L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
Reem Ghanem
143W–82L career · no lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
Normalyn Emoff
82W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.38
Janet Conrad
76W–78L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Dainn Park
34W–19L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.35
Heather Hunter
146W–83L career · no lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
Mary Crall
58W–36L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Robin Larivey
60W–40L career · no lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Brandi Burch
82W–58L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Cassandra Stuber
4W–16L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Allison McGrath
43W–26L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Chelsea Dreven
43W–16L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Kate Jenks
54W–50L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16
Jackie Castleforte
40W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%19%81%
3.12
3.5
Beth Gittins
54W–78L career · no lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3
Diana Obrokta
42W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Tiina Kekalainen
83W–76L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
3
Ashley Lundberg
52W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Alison Parson
29W–25L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.