Teams

LTA-Q NAVY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.38 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-05-30vs BRMST GREENLost 02
L#1 SinglesJustin Oberndorf vs Paul Billings5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTerry Johnson / Michael Lax vs John Herby / John Post6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-27vs NJ REDLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Johnson / Justin Oberndorf vs Nathaniel Strout / Steve Thompson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-23vs RMTC NAVYWon 10
W#2 DoublesPrabhakar Chandana / Justin Oberndorf vs Jim Latsko / Dan Raykovitz6-0, 7-5
2023-05-09vs TTA-E BLACKSplit 11
W#2 DoublesPrabhakar Chandana / Justin Oberndorf vs Randy Bell / Kevin Darby7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLong Tran / Michael Lax vs Scott Henley / Brett Herbert4-6, 3-6
2023-05-02vs MEA GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichael Lax / Prabhakar Chandana vs Steve Craig / David Brown3-6, 1-6
2023-04-30vs BRMST GREENWon 10
W#3 DoublesPrabhakar Chandana / Justin Oberndorf vs Kent MacLennan / Joel Walter6-1, 6-4
2023-04-18vs RMTC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJames Walker / Justin Oberndorf vs Richard Bagley / Jim Latsko6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Lax / Terry Johnson vs Ryan Urness / Danny Wages3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Shea Martin
published
3.38
Prabhakar Chandana
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Justin Oberndorf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Chip Kelsey
published 3.5
3.15
Shijung Kim
published
3.09
Michael Lax
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.05
Long Tran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Justin Oberndorf + Prabhakar Chandana14162% games+3.4% vs expected
Chip Kelsey + Justin Oberndorf123 matchesnot enough data
Justin Oberndorf + Long Tran123 matchesnot enough data
Michael Lax + Prabhakar Chandana123 matchesnot enough data
Prabhakar Chandana + Shijung Kim303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shea Martin
15W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
3.5
Prabhakar Chandana
42W–19L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Justin Oberndorf
49W–49L career · 6 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Chip Kelsey
45W–47L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Shijung Kim
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3
Michael Lax
22W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%26%74%
3.09
Long Tran
6W–15L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.