Teams

DH-Thompson

2026 Mixed 55 & Over-GC · 4.0 Mixed

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26vs Biloxi - ShoemakeLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheldon Zhang / Mary Kay Walk vs Christina Robinson / Jack Robinson0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathleen Marlowe / Michael Thompson vs Nancy Howell / Paul Benigno6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-07-02vs Biloxi - ShoemakeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hailes / Phil Schmidt vs Christina Robinson / Paul Benigno7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathleen Marlowe / Michael Thompson vs Nancy Howell / Jack Robinson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Mary Ann Strickland vs Henry P Calamari / Sherri White6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-28vs Biloxi - ShoemakeLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Marlowe / Michael Thompson vs Paul Benigno / Dianne Holloway6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhil Schmidt / Mary Kay Walk vs Christina Robinson / Dana Ladnier2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Hailes / Jennifer Hailes vs Jack Robinson / Amanda Letonoff6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-06-25vs Biloxi - ShoemakeLost 03
L#1 DoublesColin Jones / Kathleen Marlowe vs Julie West / Kelly Lee3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesApril Mechatto / Michael Thompson vs Dianne Holloway / Chris Emerson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Hailes / Shannon Hailes vs Amanda Letonoff / Henry P Calamari4-6, 4-6
2026-06-14vs Biloxi - ShoemakeLost 03
L#1 DoublesPhil Schmidt / April Mechatto vs Kelly Lee / Julie West6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoseph Gregory / Mary Ann Strickland vs Henry P Calamari / Sherri White3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesShannon Hailes / Jennifer Hailes vs Nancy Howell / Dana Ladnier6-7, 4-6
2026-06-11vs Biloxi - ShoemakeLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Hailes / Sheldon Zhang vs Nancy Howell / Paul Benigno6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNicole Montagnet / Michael Thompson vs Sherri White / Chris Emerson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Marlowe / Colin Jones vs Christina Robinson / Dana Ladnier3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Colin Jones
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.76
Sheldon Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.64
Phil Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Mary Ann Strickland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.55
Shannon Hailes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Nicole Montagnet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Kathleen Marlowe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.21
Jennifer Hailes
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.20
April Mechatto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
2.83
Mary Kay Walk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Michelle Foley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Kay Walk + Sheldon Zhang3249% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Hailes + Shannon Hailes0538% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Hailes + Sheldon Zhang224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Colin Jones
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Sheldon Zhang
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Phil Schmidt
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
Mary Ann Strickland
13W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Shannon Hailes
3W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
3.55
Nicole Montagnet
38W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.36
Kathleen Marlowe
24W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.34
Jennifer Hailes
23W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
4
April Mechatto
10W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
3.20
Mary Kay Walk
10W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
Michelle Foley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.