Teams

Sports Mall-Granger/Osley

2023 Winter League-Saturday · 4.0M Saturday

14 players · average NTRP 3.89 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-04-01vs Sports Mall-GreeneLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristopher Ahearn / Rod Schmidt vs Jerad Amundsen / Bode Widerburg4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAndrew Osborn / Floyd Gordon vs Jonathan Greene / David Hubert4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMike Logan / Matt Logan vs Lennie Torres / Krishna Sravanth Mannuru4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-03-25vs Ivory Ridge-Bleak/PayneWon 21
W#1 DoublesJake Johnson / Christopher Ahearn vs Tanner Squires / Brandon Eliason0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrew Osborn / Rod Schmidt vs Michael Tingey / Andrew Wood6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesTROY GRANGER / Mike Logan vs Steven Black / Paul Clifford4-6, 5-6
2023-03-18vs RISE AC-McKeeLost 03
L#1 DoublesFloyd Gordon / Rick Hagen vs Steven Miner / Brad Allen4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJim Jones / TROY GRANGER vs Travis Thompson / Abel Thompson2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJames Soares / Brad Flitton vs Robert Bybel / Jeremiah Stokka6-7, 1-4
2023-03-11vs Wasatch Hills-WatsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesRick Hagen / James Soares vs Van Vu / Curtis Sampson3-6, 2-5
L#2 DoublesTROY GRANGER / Jim Jones vs Brady Rasmussen / Timothy Smith3-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesFloyd Gordon / Rod Schmidt vs Don Tran / Dang Quach5-7, 5-4, 0-1
2023-02-25vs Liberty Park Tennis-WhiteWon 21
W#1 DoublesFloyd Gordon / Christopher Ahearn vs Colby Pomeroy / Christopher Johnson7-5, 4-4
L#2 DoublesJames Soares / TROY GRANGER vs Kasen Wright / Nicholas Geer2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMike Logan / Matt Logan vs Chris White / Damon Toth6-1, 6-3
2023-02-11vs Salt Lake Tennis-D'agostini/RidingLost 12
L#1 DoublesRod Schmidt / Andrew Osborn vs Paul Limburg / Taylor Blake7-5, 3-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesTROY GRANGER / Brad Flitton vs Brandon Williams / Brian Annen6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJake Johnson / Carter Smith vs Brady Patrick / Garrett Snyder2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-04vs Wasatch Hills-HendrixWon 20
W#1 DoublesRod Schmidt / Mike Logan vs Baovuong Nguyen / Kole Prestwich6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJake Johnson / Andrew Osborn vs Nathan Jones / Russell Shino7-6, 6-2
2023-01-28vs Liberty Park Tennis-Tsujino/WillesLost 03
L#1 DoublesJake Johnson / Rod Schmidt vs Remi Barron / Andres J J Gonzalez Roa3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Ahearn / TROY GRANGER vs Brian Crowe / Brandon Khoune2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Soares / Matt Logan vs CHRISTOPHER HO / Jeff Meiling1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0M Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Mike Logan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Carter Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Matt Logan
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.71
Andrew Osborn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Jake Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.66
Floyd Gordon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.65
Christopher Ahearn
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Jim Jones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
3.37
TROY GRANGER
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
James Soares
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Brad Flitton
published
Rick Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rod Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrew Osborn + Christopher Ahearn3358% games+15.9% vs expected
Jake Johnson + Mike Logan7257% games+8.9% vs expected
Floyd Gordon + Christopher Ahearn5456% games+6.8% vs expected
Andrew Osborn + Mike Logan5160% games+4.2% vs expected
Mike Logan + Carter Smith12457% games+3.3% vs expected
Andrew Osborn + TROY GRANGER81051% games+0.1% vs expected
Mike Logan + TROY GRANGER9749% games+0.1% vs expected
Christopher Ahearn + Jake Johnson6449% games−2.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mike Logan
172W–62L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Carter Smith
52W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4
Matt Logan
112W–31L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Andrew Osborn
54W–43L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Jake Johnson
175W–131L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Floyd Gordon
80W–85L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Christopher Ahearn
30W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.65
Jim Jones
28W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.53
4
Rodrigo Nascimento
21W–21L career · no lines in 2023
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
TROY GRANGER
69W–120L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
James Soares
32W–59L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Brad Flitton
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rick Hagen
11W–31L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rod Schmidt
15W–30L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.