Teams

LATA40/Sutton/CTFC

2026 Tri-Level 40 & Over · Adult Women - 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekend

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-17vs LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKris Sutton / Natasha Wright vs Nancy Butts Foy / Kay Wescott0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRita Squires / Traci Suber vs Molly Price / Traci Gilden6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesArlene Wilkes / Elizabeth Regan vs Anne Belue / Beverly Campbell1-6, 5-7
2026-06-30vs LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesNatasha Wright / Barbara Bowens vs Kay Wescott / Angel Roddy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKris Sutton / Rita Squires vs Cindy Bane / Wendel Franklin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Regan / Courtney Stein vs Anne Belue / Beth Belcher3-6, 2-6
2026-06-23vs LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)Won 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Mills / Maira Trimble vs Angel Roddy / Kay Wescott2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRita Squires / Natasha Wright vs Jennifer Wild / Leslie Downs6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAddie Dooley / Traci Suber vs Beth Belcher / Anne Belue6-1, 6-0
2026-06-14vs LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)Won 21
W#1 DoublesRita Squires / Natasha Wright vs Kay Wescott / Amanda Willoughby6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKris Sutton / Maira Trimble vs Cindy Bane / Page Ream7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Regan / Courtney Stein vs Marybeth Meyers / Elizabeth Fernandes6-3, 6-1
2026-06-07vs LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Mills / Barbara Bowens vs Nancy Butts Foy / Kay Wescott2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesKris Sutton / Rita Squires vs Page Ream / Cindy Bane3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Forrest / Elizabeth Regan vs Elizabeth Fernandes / Helen Cupertino4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2026-05-31vs LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesRita Squires / Natasha Wright vs Sarah Zupon / Kay Wescott6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMaira Trimble / Addie Dooley vs Traci Gilden / Leslie Downs6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesArlene Wilkes / Deborah Poston vs Beth Belcher / Anne Belue2-6, 1-6
2026-05-17vs LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesRita Squires / Barbara Bowens vs Nancy Butts Foy / Amanda Willoughby0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTraci Suber / Addie Dooley vs Molly Price / Traci Gilden6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Poston / Melissa Forrest vs Beverly Campbell / Helen Cupertino3-6, 1-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Adult Women - 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 Weekend
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LATA 4.0W 40 & Over (Price)5214718169
2LATA40/Sutton/CTFC2571429201

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Natasha Wright
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.31
Maira Trimble
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Rita Squires
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.23
Kris Sutton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Addie Dooley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.15
Michelle Willm
published
3.02
Traci Suber
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Barbara Bowens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Elizabeth Regan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Cindy Mills
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.81
Arlene Wilkes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Courtney Stein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Melissa Forrest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Deborah Poston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Traci Suber + Addie Dooley5165% games+18.3% vs expected
Rita Squires + Natasha Wright3254% games+8.2% vs expected
Kris Sutton + Michelle Willm1844% games−2.2% vs expected
Rita Squires + Traci Suber404 matchesnot enough data
Rita Squires + Kris Sutton033 matchesnot enough data
Kris Sutton + Cindy Mills213 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Mills + Michelle Willm123 matchesnot enough data
Maira Trimble + Addie Dooley213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natasha Wright
39W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.37
Maira Trimble
29W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
Rita Squires
29W–43L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Kris Sutton
77W–65L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3
Addie Dooley
33W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.16
Michelle Willm
65W–84L career · no lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
Traci Suber
45W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3.5
Barbara Bowens
35W–87L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Elizabeth Regan
48W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%18%
2.87
3.5
Cindy Mills
53W–143L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.84
3
Arlene Wilkes
6W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Courtney Stein
15W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
Melissa Forrest
26W–40L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Deborah Poston
18W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.