Teams

OC Coto De Caza - 830

2025 USTA Adult 40 & Over WEEKDAY WOMEN · OC 3.5W

21 players · average NTRP 3.57 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesCathy Field / Patty Rydelski vs Beth Hoss / Jodie Hoffman3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAsha Radicic vs Janna Canzone2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesLaura Baldwin / Lauren Ramirez vs Holly Cook / Nancy Kim4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTomoe Stevens / Fiorella Villar vs Melissa Fenn / Jessica Keetch2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-02-21vs OC Mesa Verde CC - Julie 930Won 30
W#1 DoublesCathy Field / Tana Ashton vs Julie Corrigan / Cindy Galitski6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Beykpour / Danielle Futrell vs Reiko Kurakazu / Renee Carlson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMadona Shaheen / Asha Radicic vs Karen Barloon / Heather Plascencia7-5, 6-3
2025-02-11vs OC Marguerite MVTC - Caroline 1030Split 22
L#1 DoublesLauren Ramirez / Gwen Stavros vs Caroline Gee / Julia Keene3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRachel McPheron vs Ellen Aistars6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaria Valera / Tana Ashton vs Gillian Levy / Tricia Collins6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAllie Bertocchini / Dana Orsini vs Laura Anderson / Jenny Thurrell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-01-17vs OC NBTC - Elaiza - 10Won 31
W#1 DoublesMaria Valera / Cathy Field vs Nancee Weingarden / Kristy Gladding6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRachel McPheron vs Carey Welbourn6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Beykpour / Gwen Stavros vs Allegra Fulcher / Maria Kelley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTomoe Stevens / Laura Baldwin vs Leigh Donaldson Carman / Gianna Marchal5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Tana Ashton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Allie Bertocchini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.40
Laura Baldwin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.33
Cathy Field
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Dana Orsini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Fiorella Villar
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Gwen Stavros
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Maria Valera
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Asha Radicic
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Shelly Carroll
published
3.22
Madona Shaheen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Danielle Futrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Tomoe Stevens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Patty Rydelski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Sarah Cieslik
published
2.96
Alexandra Simon
published 3
Gina Rindahl
published
Jeannette Siciliani
published
Rachel McPheron
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Semra Nogueira
published
Tammy Beykpour
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cathy Field + Maria Valera224 matchesnot enough data
Cathy Field + Fiorella Villar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tana Ashton
24W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
4
Allie Bertocchini
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Laura Baldwin
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Cathy Field
16W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Dana Orsini
15W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Fiorella Villar
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%9%
3.31
Gwen Stavros
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Maria Valera
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Asha Radicic
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Shelly Carroll
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.24
Madona Shaheen
18W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Danielle Futrell
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.17
Tomoe Stevens
15W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Patty Rydelski
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
Sarah Cieslik
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Alexandra Simon
13W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Gina Rindahl
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jeannette Siciliani
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel McPheron
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Semra Nogueira
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tammy Beykpour
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.