Teams

Cornelius

2025 Montgomery Doubles Summer Women · Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-03vs Brady - Manor 3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesKerith Eckart / Bonnie Skafte vs Katie Brand / Heather Tinsley6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Elizabeth Overmann vs KAREN WALKER / Laura Davis3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHelen Chao / Jocelyn Lin vs Kathryn Lloyd / Mary Lou Goehrung6-2, 6-0
2025-08-25vs EspositoWon 21
W#1 DoublesKerith Eckart / Paula Pels vs Barbara Braffett / Katey Nalls3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Elizabeth Overmann vs Jenny Kehoe / Kelly Young3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChenchen Feng / Lemin Xiao vs Tamara Kucik / Niki Hamilton6-1, 6-0
2025-08-13vs Wager - Congressional 3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesHelen Chao / Paula Pels vs Carina Bartozzi / Kathryn Powell5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJocelyn Lin / Lemin Xiao vs Chandler Carr / Emily Warke7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBonnie Skafte / Elizabeth Overmann vs Jennifer Love / Stephanie van Pelt2-6, 1-6
2025-08-04vs Brady - Manor 3.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Lin / Chenchen Feng vs Laura Davis / Katie Brand6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Elizabeth Overmann vs KAREN WALKER / Mary Lou Goehrung6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHelen Chao / Lemin Xiao vs Veronica Vannoy / Marilyn Mess6-2, 6-4
2025-07-28vs EspositoLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Emma Wells vs Jennifer Donaghue / Barbara Braffett6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSanam Boroumand / Kerith Eckart vs Missy Edwards / Jenny Kehoe6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChenchen Feng / Lemin Xiao vs Tonya Esposito / Kelly Bradshaw4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-11vs Wager - Congressional 3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Cornelius / Kerith Eckart vs Alexandra Doyle / Skye Replogle4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Lin / Chenchen Feng vs Jaci Peterson / Samantha Brown2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBonnie Skafte / Sara Zalowitz vs Jennifer Love / Stephanie van Pelt3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Doubles Summer 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Emma Wells
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.98
Chenchen Feng
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Kerith Eckart
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.95
Paula Pels
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Margaret Cornelius
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
2.77
Sara Zalowitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.72
Helen Chao
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Sanam Boroumand
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Lemin Xiao
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Bonnie Skafte
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Elizabeth Overmann
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Jocelyn Lin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Cornelius + Elizabeth Overmann5163% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Wells
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Chenchen Feng
11W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.98
Kerith Eckart
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Paula Pels
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Margaret Cornelius
14W–20L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.80
Sara Zalowitz
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Helen Chao
10W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
5%92%2%
2.72
Sanam Boroumand
7W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
2.5
Bonnie Skafte
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elizabeth Overmann
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jocelyn Lin
5W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.