Teams

Nau/Nashville

2026 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-25vs Lahey/NashvilleLost 23
W#1 DoublesMarjorie George / Lauren Pollard vs Meredith Amyx / Ann Frantz6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErin Neal vs Stefani Sandow6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJULIE GONTAREK / Susana Huddleston vs Rebecca Sara Cook / Leena Choi5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Frankel Nau / Elizabeth Coburn vs Susan Lahey / Kelly Bennie3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#4 DoublesKate Elasy / Kate Stout vs Marcella Tudeen / Sunyoung Fitt0-6, 2-6
2026-04-18vs Monte/Spittle/NashvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMarjorie George / JULIE GONTAREK vs Lynn Blocher / Claudia Paz4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJoy Cox / Kelli Haywood vs Micol Cecchi / Ashwini Kashelikar3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmy Frankel Nau / Maggie Stockton vs Laura Monesmith / Susan Gillis6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesNancy Ricciardelli / Lele Thompson vs Tiffany King / Linda Staffen6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-04-11vs Mouser/Givens/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesLauren Pollard / Marjorie George vs Mary Mouser / Kelly Clapp6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesErin Neal vs Stephanie Hill6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Angus / Elizabeth Coburn vs Ashley West / Brittany Drescher3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesEileen Smith / Joy Cox vs Melissa Goldberg / Stephanie Protz6-2, 6-3
L#4 DoublesCarey Burch / Maggie Stockton vs Brandy Kennedy / Patricia Frawley3-6, 1-6
2026-04-04vs Lahey/NashvilleWon 41
W#1 DoublesLauren Pollard / Eileen Smith vs Ann Frantz / LIsa Robinson6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErin Neal vs Marcia Harris6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJULIE GONTAREK / Susana Huddleston vs Rebecca Sara Cook / Susan Lahey6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKate Elasy / Nancy Ricciardelli vs Sunyoung Fitt / Thalia Kahl1-6, 0-6
W#4 DoublesElizabeth Coburn / Kelli Haywood vs Kristi Broome / Vicki Phillips6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-28vs Monte/Spittle/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesJULIE GONTAREK / Lauren Pollard vs Lynn Blocher / Donna Cox3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesErin Neal vs Jessie Seaman6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKate Stout / Amy Frankel Nau vs Susan Gillis / Olga Spittle3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarey Burch / Sarah Angus vs Micol Cecchi / Laura Monesmith5-7, 1-6
L#4 DoublesNancy Ricciardelli / Lele Thompson vs Tiffany King / Lesa Monte4-6, 4-6
2026-03-21vs Mouser/Givens/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesJULIE GONTAREK / Eileen Smith vs Brittany Drescher / Ashley West4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesErin Neal vs Jolene Chen7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJoy Cox / Lauren Pollard vs Catherine Pietsch / Patricia Frawley4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCarey Burch / Kate Stout vs Stephanie Hill / Mary Mouser3-6, 2-6
W#4 DoublesElizabeth Coburn / Kelli Haywood vs Michelle Deng / Janelle VanHootegem5-7, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Erin Neal
usually #1 Singles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.44
Lauren Pollard
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.40
Marjorie George
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Susana Huddleston
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
JULIE GONTAREK
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Kelli Haywood
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.04
Joy Cox
usually #4 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.94
Kate Stout
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.89
Elizabeth Coburn
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
Amy Frankel Nau
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.74
Maggie Stockton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Kate Elasy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
Nancy Ricciardelli
usually #4 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.66
Lele Thompson
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Carey Burch
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marjorie George + Lauren Pollard8159% games+10.2% vs expected
Joy Cox + Lauren Pollard9165% games+7.9% vs expected
Kate Elasy + Amy Frankel Nau1545% games+5.9% vs expected
Joy Cox + Kelli Haywood3258% gamesnot enough data
Susana Huddleston + JULIE GONTAREK224 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Ricciardelli + Amy Frankel Nau314 matchesnot enough data
Carey Burch + Lele Thompson123 matchesnot enough data
Marjorie George + JULIE GONTAREK123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Erin Neal
38W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.71
Lauren Pollard
43W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.44
Marjorie George
25W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Susana Huddleston
13W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
JULIE GONTAREK
18W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
3.34
Kelli Haywood
26W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%20%80%
3.11
Joy Cox
38W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.04
Kate Stout
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Elizabeth Coburn
18W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Amy Frankel Nau
20W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%9%
2.82
Maggie Stockton
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
2.74
Kate Elasy
10W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
2.72
Nancy Ricciardelli
9W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
Lele Thompson
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Carey Burch
7W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.