Teams

KA TJFF 3-0 40 7.0

2021 Mixed 40 and Over League · 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.44 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-25vs MD High FlyersLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarie Wilson / Jason Yoshimi vs Lynn Morikawa / Aaron Yamato3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMelissa Agena / Ponciano Villanos vs Cherie Dang / Miles Hirata6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesGerri Takayama / Clifford Chan vs Shannon Oba / Stuart Leong4-6, 2-6
2021-07-18vs Jus4FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesJason Yoshimi / Asami Kramberg vs Ralph Bautista / Laina Takafuji6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRussell Choy / Glenda Cockett vs Paul Chen / Ronda Sagara2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPonciano Villanos / Ida Thiede vs Wai Tak Lam / Rosalynne Kakogawa-Wong6-0, 6-2
2021-07-11vs Rare VintageLost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Yoshimi / Glenda Cockett vs Garrett Tanouye / Cherie Martyn0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWayne Tang / Asami Kramberg vs Sujin Lee / Kristopher Li0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMelissa Agena / Ponciano Villanos vs Chuck Gomes / Jacqueline Jung0-6, 2-6
2021-06-27vs Team 96797Lost 03
L#1 DoublesJason Prudente / Kanae Abe vs Warlo Pasicaran / Susan Locquiao2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWayne Tang / Shiori Tang vs Tracy Markham / Cora Toledo3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesClifford Chan / Miho Silos vs Julian Julian / Lyn Joson0-6, 2-6
2021-06-26vs BreakawayLost 03
L#1 DoublesClifford Chan / Ida Thiede vs Chris Yamamoto / Kelsey Matsu3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWayne Tang / Shiori Tang vs Steven Adachi / Lori Loo3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJason Prudente / Marie Wilson vs Donald Geil / Laura Shimada4-6, 1-6
2021-06-19vs Go for itWon 21
L#1 DoublesJason Yoshimi / Marie Wilson vs Tuan Tran / Kristin Keimig3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Prudente / Kanae Abe vs Rick Zwern / Kathryn Young6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWayne Tang / Randi Sherman vs Roger Styan / Vera Yamanaka6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2021-06-12vs Mix It UpWon 21
L#1 DoublesWayne Tang / Shiori Tang vs Kyle Wright / Stacey Merrick1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJason Yoshimi / Kanae Abe vs Glenn Medeiros / Wendy Bernier7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesClifford Chan / Miho Silos vs Terence Leong / Maria Manaois6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Melissa Agena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Kanae Abe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.42
Jason Prudente
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Shiori Tang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Russell Choy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Jason Yoshimi
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.34
Gerri Takayama
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Asami Kramberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Marie Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Wayne Tang
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.15
Ida Thiede
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Glenda Cockett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Clifford Chan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Ponciano Villanos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Yoshimi + Ida Thiede51245% games−1.0% vs expected
Jason Yoshimi + Gerri Takayama1538% games−14.4% vs expected
Wayne Tang + Shiori Tang2737% gamesnot enough data
Jason Yoshimi + Marie Wilson1543% gamesnot enough data
Jason Prudente + Kanae Abe2447% gamesnot enough data
Ida Thiede + Wayne Tang2348% gamesnot enough data
Jason Yoshimi + Shiori Tang224 matchesnot enough data
Jason Prudente + Marie Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa Agena
133W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.83
3.5
Kanae Abe
112W–93L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%51%49%
3.50
Jason Prudente
104W–80L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.42
Shiori Tang
74W–60L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Russell Choy
42W–54L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%85%15%
3.37
3.5
Jason Yoshimi
107W–137L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Gerri Takayama
180W–94L career · 1 line in 2021
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Asami Kramberg
21W–34L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Marie Wilson
63W–87L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.21
Wayne Tang
56W–51L career · 5 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Ida Thiede
35W–81L career · 2 lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
3.15
2.5
Glenda Cockett
19W–44L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Clifford Chan
52W–26L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ponciano Villanos
18W–45L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.