Teams

4.0W JC-Rios Jr.

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over League - NNM · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2022-11-12vs 4.0W Lobo-StewartLost 13
L#1 DoublesErin Bradshaw / Francheska Bardacke vs Laurie Frappier / Rae Littlewood3-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBernadette Davalos vs Christi Byrd3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesRae Woods / Linda Wilson vs Teresa Stewart / Gloria Baca3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Nelson / Lisa Sly vs Gina Hulick / Veronica Dorato7-5, 6-4
2022-11-01vs 4.0W JC-O'NuskaWon 31
W#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Francheska Bardacke vs Krista Ogden / Tammy Bensch1-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Amond vs Sahreem Luergan2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Sly / Mary McBride vs Susanne Anderson / Serena Taylor6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRae Woods / Linda Wilson vs Amy Carrara / Leslie Prichard6-2, 6-2
2022-10-29vs NNM/Spindler/40&Over/4.0WSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Tammy Collins vs Deanne Miller / Kirstin Spindler6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBernadette Davalos vs Allison Malone3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDina Austin / Linda Wilson vs Rhonda Letz / Christy Tarleton6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary McBride / Rae Woods vs Kirsten Kunzler / Katie Snapp6-3, 7-6
2022-10-25vs 4.0W Tanoan-YoungbergWon 40
W#1 DoublesFrancheska Bardacke / Dina Austin vs Nicole Cosper / Kristin Youngberg6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCarla Padilla vs Julianne Wong4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTammy Collins / Linda Wilson vs Stephanie Eker / Joan Rozzoni6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Sly / Rae Woods vs Marchell Woodruff / Jennifer Stephens6-1, 6-2
2022-10-22vs 4.0W HP-JamesSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMichele Nelson / Tammy Collins vs Monica Davis / Molly Cheves3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesKaren Amond vs Lara Derderian0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSherri Bowers / Erin Bradshaw vs Susan Miller / Xiaohong Zhou6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLisa Sly / Linda Wilson vs Jennifer Sullivan / Jo Ann Erikson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-10-15vs 4.0W EG-ZiegenLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichele Nelson / Mary McBride vs Cathy Jackson / Nancy Keeran3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDina Austin / Erin Bradshaw vs Pauline Ziegen / Clare Maraist1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Sly / Rae Woods vs Jennifer Lind / Anna Hargreaves4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-11vs 4.0W TCA-RisingLost 12
W#1 DoublesErin Bradshaw / Sherri Bowers vs Lorri Brunacini Jones / Jennifer White3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDina Austin / Tammy Collins vs Karen Meoni / Alisa St John2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesRae Woods / Linda Wilson vs Quiana Salazar-King / Monica Chewiwie-Otero4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-10-10vs 4.0W Tanoan-McCormickWon 31
W#1 DoublesTammy Collins / Francheska Bardacke vs Sabrina Goodfellow / Karen Barattino6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesCarla Padilla vs Claire Heywood3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDina Austin / Lisa Sly vs Laurel Worth / Carol Vencill6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRae Woods / Karen Amond vs Aimee Richardson-Zadra / Jennifer Graham4-6, 1-6
2022-10-01vs 4.0W SFTC-KnightWon 30
W#1 DoublesDina Austin / Tammy Collins vs Roberta Joe / Pam Seats6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCarla Padilla / Linda Wilson vs Nike Kern / Leaann Knight6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Amond / Michele Nelson vs Lea Beth Ladue / Melissa Edmon3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-20vs 4.0W HP-EmmonsLost 03
L#1 DoublesTammy Collins / Dina Austin vs Virginia Hollowell / Tracy Hartzler2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSherri Bowers / Lisa Sly vs Barbara Emmons / Suzanne Freinberg4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesFrancheska Bardacke / Erin Bradshaw vs Susan Beavis / Janet Mednik4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-10vs 4.0W SFTSC-RooseveltSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDina Austin / Teresa Kapes vs Dorothy Roosevelt / Marion Carter1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBernadette Davalos vs Lilas Rajaee2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSherri Bowers / Erin Bradshaw vs Debi Croney / Jeanine Keay2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary McBride / Michele Nelson vs Nell Sale / Ellen Parker6-2, 7-6
2022-09-06vs NNM/Nevins/40&Over/4.0WLost 13
L#1 DoublesMichele Nelson / Mary McBride vs Debby Dils / Tracy Henderson2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBernadette Davalos vs Melissa Morris3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTeresa Kapes / Jennifer Johnson vs Melissa Clark / Lisa Nelson3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFrancheska Bardacke / Dina Austin vs Sandra Postel / Jill Sanchez4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NNM/Nevins/40&Over/4.0W11139926290
2NNM/Spindler/40&Over/4.0W102331540349
34.0W SFTSC-Roosevelt84331538338
44.0W HP-James84291946388
54.0W HP-Emmons84282047396
64.0W Lobo-Stewart75301844398
74.0W TCA-Rising75252353414
84.0W EG-Ziegen66252353412
94.0W JC-Rios Jr.66262255419
104.0W Tanoan-Youngberg39153368475
114.0W SFTC-Knight210103880525
124.0W JC-O'Nuska111113776512
134.0W Tanoan-McCormick11184082535

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Dina Austin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
Erin Bradshaw
published 4
3.67
Tammy Collins
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.65
Carla Padilla
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.51
Bernadette Davalos
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.46
Lisa Sly
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
3.46
Francheska Bardacke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Rae Woods
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
3.23
Michele Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Karen Amond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Mary McBride
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Sherri Bowers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Teresa Kapes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Bradshaw + Sherri Bowers7264% games+5.9% vs expected
Teresa Kapes + Dina Austin14560% games+5.7% vs expected
Lisa Sly + Rae Woods7457% games+2.7% vs expected
Dina Austin + Tammy Collins4252% games−1.5% vs expected
Michele Nelson + Mary McBride41142% games−5.8% vs expected
Sherri Bowers + Dina Austin134 matchesnot enough data
Michele Nelson + Lisa Sly123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dina Austin
147W–68L career · 9 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Erin Bradshaw
54W–44L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tammy Collins
113W–69L career · 7 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Carla Padilla
37W–38L career · 3 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Bernadette Davalos
46W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.51
Lisa Sly
102W–58L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Francheska Bardacke
47W–50L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.46
Rae Woods
116W–118L career · 11 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.28
Michele Nelson
30W–55L career · 6 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Karen Amond
35W–99L career · 4 lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Mary McBride
36W–34L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherri Bowers
69W–26L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Teresa Kapes
51W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.